2002
DOI: 10.1557/proc-717-c2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of Junctions formed by Solid Phase Epitaxial Regrowth for sub-70nm CMOS

Abstract: For the 70nm CMOS node, it is anticipated that conventional implantation and spike annealing approaches, even with pre-amorphisation and co-implantation, are unlikely to provide pMOS junctions consistent with the ITRS requirements. Here the junction performance is limited by equilibrium solid solubility.As laser annealing and in-situ doping techniques currently have unsolved integration problems, there is a renewed interest in using solid phase epitaxial regrowth (SPER) to form ultra-shallow metastable junctio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7] The drawbacks of this method are mainly related to the relative high density of residual defects at the end-of-range ͑EOR͒ region and limited thermal budget for post-anneal processing. The main advantages are the above-equilibrium activation of dopants, minimal diffusion, good control over junction depth, and compatibility with high-K and metal gate thermal budget requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7] The drawbacks of this method are mainly related to the relative high density of residual defects at the end-of-range ͑EOR͒ region and limited thermal budget for post-anneal processing. The main advantages are the above-equilibrium activation of dopants, minimal diffusion, good control over junction depth, and compatibility with high-K and metal gate thermal budget requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though not widely recognized, the extremely shallow junctions that are the focus of study in research groups often have a considerable amount of leakage current to the substrate due a variety of reasons such as probe penetration to the substrate, 11 band to band tunneling, 12 and end of range (EOR) damage left after the anneal. Irrespective of the mechanism, the leakage current to the substrate provides an alternative path for the current to flow resulting in erroneous, low sheet resistance readings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, low energy boron implants followed by rapid thermal anneals suffer from low levels of dopant activation limited by the equilibrium solid solubility of boron in Si. Coimplants of F or C along with dopant implants are a alternate route to obtaining reduced dopant diffusion and/or higher activation along with more abrupt junctions [3][4][5][6]. Carbon is found to reduce boron diffusion more efficiently than fluorine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%