2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising the tip-apex-distance in trochanteric femoral fracture fixation using the ADAPT-navigated technique, a longitudinal matched cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TAD is a useful criterion for cut-out risks, the ideal value being 5 mm < TAD < 20 mm [ 16 , 17 ]. Herzog et al concluded that the use of ADAPT resulted in a significant reduction in TAD and a more optimal positioning of the lag screw [ 18 ]. Our results also showed a significant reduction in TAD with the use of ADAPT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TAD is a useful criterion for cut-out risks, the ideal value being 5 mm < TAD < 20 mm [ 16 , 17 ]. Herzog et al concluded that the use of ADAPT resulted in a significant reduction in TAD and a more optimal positioning of the lag screw [ 18 ]. Our results also showed a significant reduction in TAD with the use of ADAPT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the center of the lag screw/blade should be located in the second quarter of the head-neck interface line (safe zone) rather than the center of the neck 43 . Moreover, a TAD over 25 mm should be avoided as it has been shown to increase the risk of cutout 44 . During the fixation, the CMN independently provides centralized support to the proximal fragment and the interfragmentary compression, namely dynamization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of each model parameter was listed in Table 1 and the parameters were described individually below. As previous publications comparing navigated IMN with traditional IMN had a short follow-up period (13,(25)(26)(27)(31)(32)(33), we used a 5-year time horizon for the present analysis. The model considered four states, which were categorized as follows: (1) successful IMN with the lag screw inside the safe zone, (2) successful IMN with the lag screw outside the safe zone, (3) salvage treatment of total hip arthroplasty (THA) after failed IMN and (4) death.…”
Section: Model Designmentioning
confidence: 99%