2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13213-013-0622-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and evaluation of a multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of prominent foodborne pathogens of Enterobacteriaceae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Detection of very low levels of bacterial contamination in food necessitates that these samples to be cultured for a few hours in peptone water for providing conditions for growth and multiplication of bacterial pathogens to a detectable level, dilution of inhibitory substances present in food and dilution of dead target cells, which provides some assurance that the detected DNA belongs from viable target cells. The multiplex PCR reported in our study had a reasonably high level of sensitivity in experimentally spiked chicken pulav samples and able to detect as low as 10 1 and 10 2 organisms per ml of Shigella and Salmonella enterica respectively following 5 h enrichment in peptone water thus the sensitivity was much better when compared to other reports (Babu et al , 2013; Ojha et al , 2013). According to Ohja et al (2013) detection limit of mpcr after preincubation in GNB (Gram Negative Broth) was 5 × 10 4 cells and according to Babu et al (2013) mpcr detection limit was 10 cfu /PCR after 10 h of incubation in BHI broth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detection of very low levels of bacterial contamination in food necessitates that these samples to be cultured for a few hours in peptone water for providing conditions for growth and multiplication of bacterial pathogens to a detectable level, dilution of inhibitory substances present in food and dilution of dead target cells, which provides some assurance that the detected DNA belongs from viable target cells. The multiplex PCR reported in our study had a reasonably high level of sensitivity in experimentally spiked chicken pulav samples and able to detect as low as 10 1 and 10 2 organisms per ml of Shigella and Salmonella enterica respectively following 5 h enrichment in peptone water thus the sensitivity was much better when compared to other reports (Babu et al , 2013; Ojha et al , 2013). According to Ohja et al (2013) detection limit of mpcr after preincubation in GNB (Gram Negative Broth) was 5 × 10 4 cells and according to Babu et al (2013) mpcr detection limit was 10 cfu /PCR after 10 h of incubation in BHI broth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…The multiplex PCR reported in our study had a reasonably high level of sensitivity in experimentally spiked chicken pulav samples and able to detect as low as 10 1 and 10 2 organisms per ml of Shigella and Salmonella enterica respectively following 5 h enrichment in peptone water thus the sensitivity was much better when compared to other reports (Babu et al , 2013; Ojha et al , 2013). According to Ohja et al (2013) detection limit of mpcr after preincubation in GNB (Gram Negative Broth) was 5 × 10 4 cells and according to Babu et al (2013) mpcr detection limit was 10 cfu /PCR after 10 h of incubation in BHI broth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Whole-genomic DNA extraction was performed by boiling lysis method, preparing the cell suspension of purely isolated bacterial colonies, as performed previously [19]. Already designed conserved regions, specific blaOXA, blaSHV, and blaTEM primers were optimized for multiplex PCR [20,21].…”
Section: Bla Oxa Blashv and Blatem Multiplex Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foram então coletadas alíquotas de 1,0 mL do caldo GN para a extração do DNA total. (Okuno et al,2018;Choi et al, 2013;Babu et al,2013)…”
Section: Preparo Das Amostrasunclassified