2009
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/47.8.689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of a Novel Procedure for Determination of VOCs in Water and Human Urine Samples Based on SBSE Coupled with TD-GC-HRMS

Abstract: In this study, stir-bar sorptive extraction and thermal desorption followed by gas chromatography coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry was applied for determination of halo-organic compounds (bromodichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, bromoform, and tetrachloroethylene) in water and human urine samples. Time of extraction and stirring speed were optimized. The results show that the optimum extraction time is 30 min with 600 rpm of stirring speed with Twister of 20 mm in length and 1.0-mm film thickn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In SBSE, PDMS stir bar is placed in aqueous sample (liquid phase), whereas in SPME, the PDMS fiber is exposed to the headspace (HS) of sample (gas phase) (Figure 10). These two extraction methods both use PDMS phase for sampling, however, the volume of PDMS layer in SBSE is 50 to 250 times bigger than SPME (Jakubowska, Henkelmann, Schramm, & Namiesnik, 2009). As a result, SBSE provides a higher recovery and sensitivity than SPME (Castro & Ross, 2015).…”
Section: Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (Sbse)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SBSE, PDMS stir bar is placed in aqueous sample (liquid phase), whereas in SPME, the PDMS fiber is exposed to the headspace (HS) of sample (gas phase) (Figure 10). These two extraction methods both use PDMS phase for sampling, however, the volume of PDMS layer in SBSE is 50 to 250 times bigger than SPME (Jakubowska, Henkelmann, Schramm, & Namiesnik, 2009). As a result, SBSE provides a higher recovery and sensitivity than SPME (Castro & Ross, 2015).…”
Section: Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (Sbse)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of SBSE applications include determination of volatile compounds in cooked cured pork ham [145], volatile organic compounds in human urine, and water samples [146], organic pollutants in water samples [147], free fatty acids in the exudates of cooked ham [148], barbiturates in urine [149], coffee volatiles in roasted Arabica coffee [150], organic pollutants in water samples [151] and odorous compounds in drinking water [152]. Recently, SBSE has been used for enhanced recovery of pesticides in wines and aromatic compounds in beers [153] and selective enrichment and analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls in fish [154].…”
Section: Stir-bar Sorptive Extraction (Sbse)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCE was considered as one of the most frequently detected organic contaminants in groundwater [2,3]. Various methods have been developed for the determination of TCE including gas OPEN ACCESS chromatography (GC) coupled with either electron capture detectors (ECD) [4][5][6], mass spectrometers (MS) [7][8][9][10], or flame ionization detectors (FID) [11]. Traditional sample preparation methods for TCE such as liquid-liquid extraction and solid phase extraction are labor-intensive and time-consuming [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%