2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of a tissue-equivalent CVD-diamond dosimeter for radiotherapy using the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently more accurate MC simulations, taking into account the exact geometry of the CVD-diamond detector prototype, seem to confirm the trend of the energy dependence seen in Fig. 7 and stress also a non-negligible role of the encapsulation [34].…”
Section: Energy Dependencementioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Currently more accurate MC simulations, taking into account the exact geometry of the CVD-diamond detector prototype, seem to confirm the trend of the energy dependence seen in Fig. 7 and stress also a non-negligible role of the encapsulation [34].…”
Section: Energy Dependencementioning
confidence: 57%
“…This could be partly due not only to the high-atomic-number material of electrodes but also partly due to the not fully optimized geometry of the prototype. Therefore certain improvements to its construction as regard to the material of electrodes and geometry of the encapsulation were recently proposed by Górka et al [34]. Basic examinations performed with three encapsulated detectors showed that all of them have a high leakage current.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most MC studies do account for the dissimilar mass densities of crystalline graphite and diamond (Mobit et al 1997, Scott et al 2012, Bouchard et al 2015, Andreo and Benmakhlouf 2017, Fenwick et al 2018, Kaveckyte et al 2020. The choice of the I-value varies and only a couple of investigations have employed I = 87.6 eV (Górka et al 2006, Górka et al 2008, Marsolat et al 2015. Other articles do not specify the I-value at all, but it is reasonable to assume that it was the same as that recommended for graphite (78 eV or 81.0 eV depending on the date of publication).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the results provided by the different codes is directly related to the accuracy of the implemented transport model and its data libraries associated with the cross section of the transported particles. Thus, the mixed charged particle transport algorithm, implemented by the penetration and energy loss of positron and electrons (PENELOPE) code [29], led to its intense use in radiotherapy [30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%