2001
DOI: 10.1243/0957650011538802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of multistage turbines using a through-flow code

Abstract: Fast and accurate flow calculation and performance prediction of multistage axial flow turbines at design and off-design conditions were performed using a compressible steady state inviscid through-flow code with high fidelity loss and mixing models. The code is based on a stream function model and a finite element solution procedure. A new design system has been developed which optimizes hub and shroud geometry and inlet and exit flow field parameters for each blade row of a multistage axial flow turbine. Opt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For steady-state problems, the governing equations can be symbolically expressed as B [o tp h y , u fo t p h y , Otge o ) , X ( o t g e o ) ] -0 ( 2 ) and can be regarded as an equality constraint for the minimization problem. For steady-state problems, the governing equations can be symbolically expressed as B [o tp h y , u fo t p h y , Otge o ) , X ( o t g e o ) ] -0 ( 2 ) and can be regarded as an equality constraint for the minimization problem.…”
Section: Background On Adjoint Methods For Fluid Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For steady-state problems, the governing equations can be symbolically expressed as B [o tp h y , u fo t p h y , Otge o ) , X ( o t g e o ) ] -0 ( 2 ) and can be regarded as an equality constraint for the minimization problem. For steady-state problems, the governing equations can be symbolically expressed as B [o tp h y , u fo t p h y , Otge o ) , X ( o t g e o ) ] -0 ( 2 ) and can be regarded as an equality constraint for the minimization problem.…”
Section: Background On Adjoint Methods For Fluid Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in standard shape optimization problems, the physical variables appearing in expressions (1) and (2) are to be considered as fixed known parameters (i.e., are not considered variables in the design pro cess). However, in standard shape optimization problems, the physical variables appearing in expressions (1) and (2) are to be considered as fixed known parameters (i.e., are not considered variables in the design pro cess).…”
Section: Background On Adjoint Methods For Fluid Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are two diffusion factors in the literature, diffusion factor and equivalent diffusion factor (D eq ). The latter is implemented within the SLC methodology, which is formulized in equation (20)…”
Section: Geometric and Aerodynamic Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[16][17][18][19] However, reports on through-flow design optimization not only by genetic algorithm, but also by other stochastic methods are quite limited, even in the simplified case of single-stream compressor and turbines. The study of Petrovic et al 20 presents an application of genetic algorithm (hybridized with gradient method) on through-flow optimization of a turbine, where maximum efficiency is provided. In a similar through-flow optimization study, Park et al 21 obtained 0.5-1.5% increase in efficiency of a threestage low pressure compressor by perturbing booster hub and shroud geometries using hybrid genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%