2019
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of skin dose usingin‐vivoMOSFETdose measurements in bolus/non‐bolus fraction ratio: AVMATand a 3DCRTstudy

Abstract: In‐phantom and in‐vivo three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) skin doses, measured with and without bolus in a female anthropomorphic phantom RANDO and in patients, were compared against treatment planning system calculated values. A thorough characterization of the metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor measurement system was performed prior to the measurements in phantoms and patients. Patients with clinical indication for postoperative ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence of skin toxicity in breast radiotherapy, especially in friction regions such as the axilla and skin folds. 1 There are multiple criteria to evaluate the degree of acute and late toxicity in the skin associated with the use of radiotherapy, such as the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Both classifications consider acute reactions according to the severity of the injury caused to the skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence of skin toxicity in breast radiotherapy, especially in friction regions such as the axilla and skin folds. 1 There are multiple criteria to evaluate the degree of acute and late toxicity in the skin associated with the use of radiotherapy, such as the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Both classifications consider acute reactions according to the severity of the injury caused to the skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the skin surface is naturally curved, and positional accuracy of the dosimeters can affect the verification of the therapeutic doses in clinical practice. For instance, the MOSFET dosimeter exhibits sensitivity variations from 5% to 22.8% depending on its angular location during radiation therapy [10,11]. To overcome this issue, studies have focused on developing flexible dosimeters with functional materials [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, as the attachment part on a patient’s body, which is naturally curved, is checked visually, the positional accuracy can be unreliable [ 6 ]. For example, the average error rate of a digital MOSFET dosimeter was reported to be 22.8% [ 7 ]. Therefore, in clinical practice, there is an urgent demand for a patch-type digital surface dosimeter that can be attached to a patient’s skin to measure the body surface in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%