2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of wind farm turbines layout using an evolutive algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
124
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively cheap computational cost of such models allows gradient-free methods to be used in the optimization process. A number of layout optimization studies have utilized gradient-free approaches to minimize wake losses (Kusiak and Song, 2010), maximize net present value (González et al, 2010), and minimize noise propagation (Kwong et al, 2012). Other optimization approaches include particle swarm optimizations that determine turbine layouts and rotor diameters (Chowdhury et al, 2012), extended pattern searches for multimodal layout optimization (Du Pont and Cagan, 2012), and even game-theoretic methods (Mar-den et al, 2013).…”
Section: Approaches To Wind Plant Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively cheap computational cost of such models allows gradient-free methods to be used in the optimization process. A number of layout optimization studies have utilized gradient-free approaches to minimize wake losses (Kusiak and Song, 2010), maximize net present value (González et al, 2010), and minimize noise propagation (Kwong et al, 2012). Other optimization approaches include particle swarm optimizations that determine turbine layouts and rotor diameters (Chowdhury et al, 2012), extended pattern searches for multimodal layout optimization (Du Pont and Cagan, 2012), and even game-theoretic methods (Mar-den et al, 2013).…”
Section: Approaches To Wind Plant Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each term included in Equation (14), with the exception of the interest rate, is a function of the wind farm layout. The corresponding mathematical expressions for each variable, as proposed by Gonzá lez et al [135,278,280], will be discussed in Section 3.2.6.…”
Section: Net Present Value (Npv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are very few other methods that also account for aspects of turbine selection in tandem with turbine placement; one other example includes the method presented by Chen et al [10], which considers differing hub-heights as an optimization parameter in maximizing wind farm power output. Other powerful wind farm layout optimization methods include those developed in [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The majority of these methods, while providing important and diverse capabilities in the context of turbine micro-siting for a single wind farm, do not simultaneously focus turbine type selection during the layout optimization process, as is required in the explorations presented in this paper.…”
Section: A Temporally-and Spatially-varying Energy Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth of the wake downwind of a turbine, also accounting for wake merging scenarios, is determined using the wake growth model proposed by [27]. The corresponding energy deficit downwind of a turbine is determined using the velocity deficit model developed by [28], which is widely used in wind farm power generation estimation [14,15,[29][30][31]. The UWFLO power generation model also accounts for the possibility of a turbine being 'partially' in the wake of another turbine located upwind.…”
Section: Approach To Determine Optimal Turbine Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation