2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.105989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing graphene production in ultrasonic devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, both the peptide (1 mg) and natural flake graphite (50 mg) were commixed in 10 mL of water, where the samples were subsequently bath sonicated for different time intervals up to 24 h. It is important to note that great care was taken to sonicate the sample at the exact same point in the bath sonicator as the position within the bath has been shown to be highly critical to the exfoliation process. 21 Once the selected sonication time was complete, unexfoliated bulk graphite was removed via centrifugation, where the dark suspension of graphene in the supernatant was analyzed with UV−vis spectroscopy. Note that prior studies 19 confirmed that when the process was completed under these conditions in the absence of peptides, no graphene exfoliation was observed.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this, both the peptide (1 mg) and natural flake graphite (50 mg) were commixed in 10 mL of water, where the samples were subsequently bath sonicated for different time intervals up to 24 h. It is important to note that great care was taken to sonicate the sample at the exact same point in the bath sonicator as the position within the bath has been shown to be highly critical to the exfoliation process. 21 Once the selected sonication time was complete, unexfoliated bulk graphite was removed via centrifugation, where the dark suspension of graphene in the supernatant was analyzed with UV−vis spectroscopy. Note that prior studies 19 confirmed that when the process was completed under these conditions in the absence of peptides, no graphene exfoliation was observed.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is critical that the process be optimized to ensure maximum graphene exfoliation as a function of the reaction conditions to achieve individual to few-layered graphene materials with minimal defects. Unfortunately, this ultrasonic bath-based approach to exfoliation is highly sensitive to the position of the reaction within the sonic bath, as highlighted recently, which can lead to significant issues associated with reproducibility in exfoliation processes . For instance, even slight variations in reaction position within the bath can lead to substantial differences in exfoliation efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the ultrasound process, the π orbitals are not altered, as occurs in the methods based on chemical modification, due to this, the obtained graphene is expected to have a better quality. [46] This route is environmentally friendly due to the substance used as solvent is distilled water. Besides, the obtaining GNPs are expected to be of high structural quality and free of contamination by chemical agents.…”
Section: Chemistryselectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the ratio between ID and IG bands, the number of layers of graphene can be accurately determined [37]. The G-band of the as-prepared GO shifted towards a higher wavenumber, indicating the oxidation of graphite-like material, which results in the formation of sp3 carbon atoms [38].…”
Section: Fourier-transform Infrared (Ft-ir) and Raman Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%