1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02525529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: The narrow bipole and tripole

Abstract: A computer model is used to calculate the optimum geometry of an epidural electrode, consisting of a longitudinal contact array, for spinal cord stimulation in the management of chronic, intractable pain. 3D models of the spinal area are used for the computation of stimulation induced fields, and a cable model of myelinated nerve fibre is used for the calculation of the threshold stimulus to excite large dorsal column and dorsal root fibres. The criteria for the geometry of the longitudinal contact array are: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
90
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
90
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the optimum geometry has been calculated, taking into account both this aspect and the preferential stimulation of DC ®bres. 56 The proposed rostro-caudal`narrow bipole' and`narrow tripole' electrodes have contacts with a rostrocaudal dimension of about 1.5 mm and a centre separation of 3.5 ± 4 mm. The contacts of a plate electrode should be about 4 mm wide.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Clinical Scsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, the optimum geometry has been calculated, taking into account both this aspect and the preferential stimulation of DC ®bres. 56 The proposed rostro-caudal`narrow bipole' and`narrow tripole' electrodes have contacts with a rostrocaudal dimension of about 1.5 mm and a centre separation of 3.5 ± 4 mm. The contacts of a plate electrode should be about 4 mm wide.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Clinical Scsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their computational model estimated the effect of anatomic parameters on the thresholds of dorsal column fibers (Struijk et al, 1992), predicted the potential location of excitation in dorsal root fibers (Struijk et al, 1993b), and analyzed the effect of CSF thickness (Struijk et al, 1993a) with clinical validations (He et al, 1994;Holsheimer et al, 1995a;Holsheimer et al, 1994). The model contributed significantly to design of stimulation lead design, suggesting optimal parameters for contact size and spacing (Holsheimer and Struijk, 1992;Holsheimer and Wesselink, 1997), to favor preferential stimulation of dorsal column fibers over root fibers (Holsheimer et al, 1995b). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…neglecting capacitive effects) to describe the volume conductor, and linear nerve models to describe nerve activation. Up to now non-linear nerve models, which can describe more facets of nerve activation [45], were mainly used for implantable systems [31,49,47], epidural stimulation [18], or motor cortex stimulation [33], where the exciting electrodes are small and close to the nerve (near-field). To address if these nerve models can also be used to model TES (far-field), we have developed a TES model that comprises a volume conductor and different non-linear nerve models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%