1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0126(199903)48:3<198::aid-pi137>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opto-mechanical properties of fibres. Part 3. Structural characterization of uniaxial orientation in drawn poly(ethylene terephthalate) by means of optical parameters

Abstract: Changes in the structure of polyethyleneterephthalate (PET) (Egyptian woollen type) fibres, with strain produced by different stresses, are evaluated from optical and density measurements. Calculation of the optical parameters is carried out using two‐beam interference fringes, and the density data are obtained from the resultant optical data. The results are utilized for calculating the virtual refractive index, the harmonic mean polarizability of the dielectric, the harmonic mean specific refractivity, the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the calculated density could also be used to follow the continuous changes occurring during the physical changes of the samples under investigation. The obtained values of the evaluated crystallinity and density were dependent on the nature of the polymer mechanical process 34–37…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the calculated density could also be used to follow the continuous changes occurring during the physical changes of the samples under investigation. The obtained values of the evaluated crystallinity and density were dependent on the nature of the polymer mechanical process 34–37…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under annealing and cold drawing conditions and following the obtained optical and mechanical parameters results, a polymeric material was obtained with modified physical properties that were due to the changes in the Δ S , CED, δ 2 , μ, E , and optical parameters. Also, to explain the different variations obtained because of thermomechanical effects, there are several structural processes that interfered that should be taken into consideration, which are discussed elsewhere 37–39. Although the degree of orientation always increases in the course of drawing, crystallinity can change in both directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%