2015 International Conference on 3D Imaging (IC3D) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ic3d.2015.7391812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordinal judgments of depth in monocularly- and stereoscopically-viewed photographs of complex natural scenes

Abstract: This study investigated the contribution of stereoscopic depth cues to the reliability of ordinal depth judgments in complex natural scenes. Participants viewed photographs of cluttered natural scenes, either monocularly or stereoscopically. On each trial, they judged which of two indicated points in the scene was closer in depth. We assessed the reliability of these judgments over repeated trials, and how well they correlated with the actual disparities of the points between the left and right eyes' views. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the current study are consistent with prior research into the contribution of stereoscopic viewing: the binocular cues added when viewing a scene stereoscopically can improve sensitivity to depth (Hornsey et al 2015). It has been concluded that binocular disparity provides complimentary depth information to the monocular pictorial cues.…”
Section: Bias and Precisionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The findings of the current study are consistent with prior research into the contribution of stereoscopic viewing: the binocular cues added when viewing a scene stereoscopically can improve sensitivity to depth (Hornsey et al 2015). It has been concluded that binocular disparity provides complimentary depth information to the monocular pictorial cues.…”
Section: Bias and Precisionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Here, we argue that the depth component in turn needs to be carefully separated into multiple dimensions, including magnitude and realism. Techniques for the measurement of the magnitude and veridicality of depth are well developed (Koenderink, 1998 ) and have been successfully applied to stereoscopic displays (Doorschot, Kappers, & Koenderink, 2001 ; Hornsey, Hibbard, & Scarfe, 2015 ). We have shown here that participants are clearly able to distinguish between magnitude and realism judgments of depth when making more subjective assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, some try to suggest that these distortions are a way of the visual system conveying how reliable our metric scene estimates are [292]. But this is not supported by the data [293].…”
Section: Human Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%