2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2009.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordinal scales of conclusions for the value of evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For their descriptive analysis, data gathered was incorporated into a database designed with SPSS 21.0 ® software, which allows for a multivariate analysis. Then tests were performed to detect missing values in items, which were replaced by the median (Hair et al, 2013;Nordgaard et al, 2010). In addition, outliers were identified by standardizing variables.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For their descriptive analysis, data gathered was incorporated into a database designed with SPSS 21.0 ® software, which allows for a multivariate analysis. Then tests were performed to detect missing values in items, which were replaced by the median (Hair et al, 2013;Nordgaard et al, 2010). In addition, outliers were identified by standardizing variables.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good consistency requires that the items have correlation values close to 1; the consistency is poor if the correlation values are close to 0. When values are minor than 0.70, then the items are considered irrelevant, so they can be eliminated [24,25]. For considering the feasibility measure, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index and a Bartlett test were performed [26].…”
Section: Reliability and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%