Organization and system theories in interprofessional research: a scoping review

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increasing impetus to define and develop theoretical foundations for interprofessional research. Currently, the theories cited in such research have often focused on individual and group learning. By comparison, organization and systems theories (OST) enable consideration of system and organization level factors. A scoping review was conducted to explore the use of OST in interprofessional research published between 2013-2019. Thirty-two studies were included and 13 OST were identified. Activity theory and complexity theory were the most commonly used OST. OST are relatively well integrated into data analysis and reporting of research findings, with less consideration given to how OST can support research designs. A primary reason researchers cited for selecting OST was that such theories could best reflect the complexity of interprofessional activities.OST provide a mechanism for understanding the nuances and multifactorial issues impacting interprofessional research. OST can thus address some of the challenges of introducing and sustaining interprofessional initiatives and should be further utilized within interprofessional research.

“We're all truly pulling in the exact same direction”: A qualitative study of attending and resident physician impressions of structured bedside interdisciplinary rounds

“…This practice offers numerous benefits, including increased collaboration and improved trust among physicians and staff, enhanced safety and efficiency, and the development of a stronger teamwork culture, leading to improved provider satisfaction. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Several studies have demonstrated that bedside IDR can improve patient outcomes, including mortality rates, adverse events, readmissions, and costs of care, while also increasing patient satisfaction. [10][11][12][13][14] Patient impressions of bedside IDR, as opposed to rounds conducted away from the bedside, have yielded mixed results.…”

Dealing with Discontinuity in Cancer Care Trajectories: Patients’ Solutions

“…These boundaries are typically considered as relatively impermeable barriers to communication and coordination, and undeniably lead to discontinuity of care with occasionally severe consequences (e.g., psychological distress or medical errors with higher rates of hospitalization) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Meanwhile, research has convincingly shown that boundaries are not insurmountable and offer opportunities for change [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Accordingly, by understanding the discontinuities that patients experience, and considering these as opportunities to reestablish continuity, healthcare systems may optimize their approaches towards increasingly specialized patient care [19].…”

The contribution of theory to an ethnographic case study on interprofessional placements in healthcare education

“…But theories need not, and indeed should not, be static entities (Painter, Borba, Hynes, Mays, & Glanz, 2008). For example, consider the progressive development of activity theory which is relatively common in interprofessional research (O'Leary & Boland, 2020). Activity theory evolved from a basic theory about how people use physical and psychological tools to achieve workplace objectives (first generation activity theory) to a much more sophisticated theory considering how workplace culture, norms and tensions influence how people act at work (third generation activity theory) (Johnston & Dornan, 2015).…”