Organizational ambidexterity as a new research paradigm in strategic management

Abstract

Long-term survival and growth depends on the firm’s ability to exploit its current competencies while exploring fundamentally new ones. Finding the balance between exploration and exploitation is called ambidexterity in the literature. This paper is a comprehensive review of organizational ambidexterity theory. Creating and maintaining the capacity to simultaneously pursue these contradictory activities is an extremely difficult managerial challenge. Although, several aspects are well-researched, especially structural and leadership solutions in large, multinational enterprises, but little is known about: (1) how ambidexterity forms in earlier growth stages? (2) What are the key drivers and elements of organizational context that makes organizations able to become ambidextrous? (3) What is the role of different managerial levels in this formation process? Reviewing the literature, in this article the author would like to introduce the paradox of exploration and exploitation, the tensions and different aspects of ambidexterity, the fields current stage and some important research gaps.

Nurses' work engagement: The influences of ambidextrous leadership, clinical nurse leadership and workload

“…With the increasing complexity of the management environment, a single leadership style can no longer meet management needs. Successful organizational leadership style should be ambidextrous, being effective in the present and adaptable to future changes (Taródy, 2016). Ambidextrous leadership is a combination of two different leadership styles.…”

A stratégiaalkotás változásának mozgatórugói, fejlődési trendjei a XXI. században = Drivers behind the change of strategy-making, and its latest trends in the 21st century

“…Az utóbbi években felerősödött a gyakorlati igény és ennek megfelelően a kutatási aktivitás a szervezetek kettős képességével (organisational ambidexterity) kapcsolatban. Van, aki a témára, mint a stratégiai menedzsmentben megjelenő új paradigmára hivatkozik és fejti ki véleményét [Taródy, 2016]. A két szóban forgó képesség a felfedezés (exploration), amely kutatást, feltárást, kísérletezést, innovációt igényel, valamint a kiaknázás (exploitation), ami olyan maga-tartási mintázatokat tartalmaz, amelyek a kifinomultsággal, hatékonysággal, teljesítménnyel, megvalósító és szelekciós képességgel jellemezhető.…”

A review of the relationship between leadership style and innovation: insights and directions for future research

“…Ambidextrous Innovation is therefore occurring at both the tactical level and the strategic level (Martin, Javalgi, & Cavusgil, 2017), and often strategiclevel innovation also derives continuous innovation at the current and tactical level (Burgelman, Maidique, & Wheelwright, 2004). Ambidextrous innovation or dual innovation allows organizations to conduct different types of innovations simultaneously, but this can happen only if the organizations have a culture that allows for ambidexterity and ambiguity (Taródy, 2016). This is because most organizations may possess either the capabilities to improve their current businesses, or what is referred to as conducting incremental innovation; or they possess the skills, mindsets and capabilities to conduct radical or disruptive innovations (Raisch, Birkinshaw, Probst, & Tushman, 2009).…”