The volume under review, edited by Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi, and Juhani Klemola, presents selected papers from the 39th ICAME conference, celebrated in Tampere in 2018. As its title suggests, it delves into the main theme of the conference, corpus linguistics and the changing society, thus bringing to the fore diachronic studies in which the interplay between linguistic changes and societal developments -be they cultural or technological -is explored. The volume comprises eleven original and thought-provoking chapters by both renowned and emerging scholars in the field of corpus linguistics. These contributions are organized into two separate parts, with the first dealing explicitly with linguistic changes that seem to respond to changes in the extralinguistic reality. Several chapters in this part of the volume also address the viability of corpora to examine the interrelation between language and society. The second part presents studies which survey language changes that are not directly connected to social advancements, but which are instead motivated by intralinguistic processes, including grammaticalization, among others.Part I opens with Martin Hilpert's chapter, a call for caution regarding research on social change and its reflection in diachronic corpora. Hilpert first draws attention to five problems to bear in mind when connecting corpus findings to extralinguistic developments. These five problems are subsequently described, and compelling counterexamples are presented to show how corpus results might be misleading if these methodological pitfalls are not considered when designing our studies and analyzing our data. Then, a case study on the English make-causative construction is provided to implement the ideas previously discussed. Taking as a starting point Greenfield's (2013) claim that the diminishing power of interpersonal authority over time is reflected in the lexicon through a decrease in the frequency of words instantiating this concept (e.g., authority, obedience), Hilpert hypothesizes that the makecausative construction, which also expresses interpersonal authority (e.g., don't make me marry him), could mirror this change as well. However, after a systematic analysis that avoids the problems identified