Encyclopedia of Life Sciences 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0022884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin and Genetic Diversity of Pig Breeds

Abstract: Genetic and archaeological findings suggest that pig domestication began about 9000–10 000 YBP at multiple sites across Eurasia, followed by their subsequent spread at a worldwide scale. Development of local types throughout the centuries led to the foundation, mostly during the nineteenth century, of current modern breeds with defined phenotypes and production abilities. Extensive intercrossing markedly increased the gene pool of these founder populations. For instance, it is well known that many European pig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weak differentiation between wild and domestic pig populations found in our study was not completely unexpected, since signs of admixture between these populations have been reported in the past, based on both microsatellite markers [41] and mitochondrial DNA [16]. Indeed, it has been suggested that recurrent backcrossing between domestic animals and their wild relatives is a common event in different species, contributing perhaps to increased genetic diversity [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The weak differentiation between wild and domestic pig populations found in our study was not completely unexpected, since signs of admixture between these populations have been reported in the past, based on both microsatellite markers [41] and mitochondrial DNA [16]. Indeed, it has been suggested that recurrent backcrossing between domestic animals and their wild relatives is a common event in different species, contributing perhaps to increased genetic diversity [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, these haplotypes segregated at similar frequencies, thereby making it impossible to discern the paternal ancestry of modern European swine breeds. The variation of pigs has been also analyzed with microsatellites (reviewed in Amills et al, 2010), but these analyses generally occur on a regional scale because the genotyping of these nuclear markers is time consuming and laborious. Such studies have detected a postglacial demographic expansion signature in European wild boars and have highlighted that, in contrast with previous mitochondrial analyses, the status of Italy as a primary domestication site is doubtful (Scandura et al, 2008).…”
Section: Moving Towards An Autosomal and Paternal Marker-based Definimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these breeds have become cosmopolitan given their excellent growth and reproductive abilities. Often, these breeds have replaced less productive local varieties, occasionally bringing local breeds to extinction (Amills et al, 2010). Without a doubt, this practice has reduced the gene pool of the porcine species to an important extent.…”
Section: Moving Towards An Autosomal and Paternal Marker-based Definimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic and archaeological findings suggest that pig domestication began about 9000–10000 years before present (YBP) at multiple sites across Eurasia, followed by their subsequent spread at a worldwide scale [1]. Historically, Europe and China are two major areas of pig breeding [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, Europe and China are two major areas of pig breeding [2]. Over the past centuries, pigs have shown marked differences between these two areas, even if many European pig breeds carry far Eastern haplotypes at high frequencies because of an ancient introgression with Chinese swine [1]. The Chinese pigs differ significantly from European pig breeds such as the Large White for many traits including fatness and ear traits [3-5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%