2019
DOI: 10.21827/ejlw.8.35666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Our “Baby” on YouTube: The Gendered Life Stories of the Unborn

Abstract: This study concerns the usage of foetal ultrasounds, more specifically those produced during the 5th month of pregnancy within the routine checks of any pregnancy in France. Interestingly, more and more parents are posting short films on YouTube of their baby-to-be using the medical images produced during such antenatal examinations. This study therefore analyses a set of 108 YouTube posts among the thousands available to understand the social implications of such posts on the unborn. Uncannily, it appears tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This case, particularly when considering the above‐noted statistics on sex and gender diversity, highlights the need to avoid reinforcing the false notion that human individuals are either 46,XY cisgender male or 46,XX cisgender female in interpreting NIPS (or other prenatal genetic testing) results. This imperative is particularly salient considering research findings that expecting parents attach themselves early in pregnancy to a child of a specific gender based on information about external genitalia from prenatal ultrasounds (Barnes, 2013, 2014; Pélage, 2019). Parental expectations based on a cisgender and heterosexual identity for their future child raises concern for psychological harm to infants who become LGBTQI (lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, queer, and intersex) children and adolescents given the importance of parental acceptance for wellbeing among LGBTQI individuals (National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2020).…”
Section: Term Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case, particularly when considering the above‐noted statistics on sex and gender diversity, highlights the need to avoid reinforcing the false notion that human individuals are either 46,XY cisgender male or 46,XX cisgender female in interpreting NIPS (or other prenatal genetic testing) results. This imperative is particularly salient considering research findings that expecting parents attach themselves early in pregnancy to a child of a specific gender based on information about external genitalia from prenatal ultrasounds (Barnes, 2013, 2014; Pélage, 2019). Parental expectations based on a cisgender and heterosexual identity for their future child raises concern for psychological harm to infants who become LGBTQI (lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, queer, and intersex) children and adolescents given the importance of parental acceptance for wellbeing among LGBTQI individuals (National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2020).…”
Section: Term Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%