2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outflows in the inner kiloparsec of NGC 1566 as revealed by molecular (ALMA) and ionized gas (Gemini-GMOS/IFU) kinematics

Abstract: Context. Tracing nuclear inflows and outflows in AGNs, determining the mass of gas involved in these, and their impact on the host galaxy and nuclear black hole, requires 3-D imaging studies of both the ionized and molecular gas. Aims. We aim to map the distribution and kinematics of molecular and ionized gas in a sample of active galaxies, to quantify the nuclear inflows and outflows. Here, we analyze the nuclear kinematics of NGC 1566 via ALMA observations of the CO J:2-1 emission at 24 pc spatial and ∼2.6 k… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the uncertainties, we only conclude that the mass of central SMBH is of the order of several 10 7 M , which is a typical mass for SMBHs in nearby galaxies (e.g. Greene & Ho 2005;Busch et al 2017;Humire et al 2018;Slater et al 2019;Fazeli et al 2019).…”
Section: Smbh Massmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Given the uncertainties, we only conclude that the mass of central SMBH is of the order of several 10 7 M , which is a typical mass for SMBHs in nearby galaxies (e.g. Greene & Ho 2005;Busch et al 2017;Humire et al 2018;Slater et al 2019;Fazeli et al 2019).…”
Section: Smbh Massmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…All four of our targets show clear spiral features (see Figure 1), with Harry and Theodore showing a strong bar feature, Neville a weak bar feature (Nair & Abraham 2010) and Padma a barlens feature (an oval-like strucutre along the bar major axis, see Athanassoula et al 2015). Simulations suggest both bars and spiral arms can drive inflows at rates an order of magnitude larger than needed to power the combined outflow and SMBH accretion rates for all four targets (0.1−few 𝑀 yr −1 ; Regan & Teuben 2004;Davies et al 2009;Lin et al 2013;Fanali et al 2015;Slater et al 2019). This order of magnitude difference is promising, since our simplifying assumption here is that the inflow must be at least enough to power both the SMBH accretion and the outflow, this means that the inflow would be sufficient to also fuel central star formation or contribute to the central gas reservoir (Tacconi & Young 1986;Böker et al 2003;Bigiel et al 2008;Leroy et al 2013;Moreno et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They find a conspicuous nuclear trailing spiral and weak non-circular motions at the periphery of the nuclear spiral arms. Recently, by analysing the nuclear kinematics of the same galaxy NGC 1566 via ALMA observations of the CO(2−1) emission, Slater et al (2019) show the presence of significant non-circular motions in the innermost (200 pc) and along spiral arms in the central kpc. They find a molecular outflow in the disc with velocities of ∼180 km s −1 in the nucleus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%