ce of the real and market value of different kinds of assets. Second, crisis ends, also, when asset prices, debt levels, and factors' income get back into the balance. When the new balance is met, economic expectations will rise, new investment cycle will start, and economy will leave the crisis. Until then, new economic policies must correct all structural instabilities and create the fundaments for recovery.Policy makers in Serbia must react to the main transitional contradiction that achieved price stability is not followed with sustainable employment. The first step in this reaction is to understand the complexity of the crisis and to identify its seeds. In our latest article [3], we intended to identify the seeds of the Serbia's economic crisis and to figure out the feasible solutions predominantly from microeconomic perspective. In this article we shift the focus to macroeconomic perspective. Again, industrial policies are at the core of feasible solution. This is what this paper attempts to explain. It proceeds in five parts. The first and second part review common macroeconomic "M" as a bottom line in macroeconomic analysis and economic policy modeling, respectively. The third and fourth part analyze Serbia's macroeconomic "M" and related economic policies, respectively. The fifth part identifies industrial policies as a main tool for elimination of structural imbalances and competitiveness gap. Also, in this part we propose the roadmap for exit from the crisis..H\ ZRUGV 6HUELD