2008
DOI: 10.1021/ac8018312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming Matrix Effects in Liquid Chromatography−Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: A major limitation in quantitative analysis with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) is represented by the so-called matrix effects in which the matrix coextracted with the analytes can alter the signal response, causing either suppression or enhancement, resulting in poor analytical accuracy, linearity, and reproducibility. In the direct electron ionization liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (direct-EI LC-MS) interface the ionization process is based on electron impact ionization, and it o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
128
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
128
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DEI has been shown to be less prone to matrix effects for direct mixture analyses [30]. When coupled with CP-MIMS, for complex samples, we observe better results (e.g., less signal reduction) than typically obtained using ESI ionization [5,7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DEI has been shown to be less prone to matrix effects for direct mixture analyses [30]. When coupled with CP-MIMS, for complex samples, we observe better results (e.g., less signal reduction) than typically obtained using ESI ionization [5,7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Typically, relatively simple mass spectra are obtained, with intense molecular ion signals [25]. Several researchers have been developing approaches to ionize trace level analytes directly from liquids using EI, including molecular beam based interfaces by the Amirav group [26,27] and direct EI (DEI) by the Cappiello group [28][29][30]. With DEI, a low flow of liquid carrier is admitted directly to a heated EI source under high vacuum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, chlorogenic acid was overestimated with the UV-PDA detector compared to the MS quantification (slope value: 1.345). Matrix effects are generally associated with response suppression effects, as observed in ESI-MS quantification, when compared to other detection methods [18,21]. Under our conditions, a co-elution phenomenon probably explains the UV/MS differences in chlorogenic acid estimations [22].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Uhplc-uv And Uhplc-ms/ms Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The main culprit of these occurrences is the complexity of the soils [24,57,58]. This phenomenon is called matrix effect (ME); it is highly compounddependent and can involve either an unexpected suppression or enhancement of the analyte response induced by the coeluting matrix [57][58][59][60]. Most of the compounds susceptible to matrix-induced enhancement are polar, capable of strong hydrogen-bonding, acids or bases [58].…”
Section: Matrix Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%