2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf03194481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overlap of temporal niches among four sympatric species of shrews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the two shrew species Neomys fodiens and Neomys anomalus co-exist in streams, but N. fodiens individuals are able to dive longer than N. anomalus and thus are able to reach and utilize a wider variety of prey [44, 45]. In contrast, fewer studies have sought to explore the relationships between the overall predatory success of a population and distinct population-level parameters that might be predictive of such success [19, 4648].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the two shrew species Neomys fodiens and Neomys anomalus co-exist in streams, but N. fodiens individuals are able to dive longer than N. anomalus and thus are able to reach and utilize a wider variety of prey [44, 45]. In contrast, fewer studies have sought to explore the relationships between the overall predatory success of a population and distinct population-level parameters that might be predictive of such success [19, 4648].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fewer studies have been devoted to the ecology of the relatively elusive water shrews, either singly or in syntopy, and the ecology of N. anomalus is particularly poorly known (Dehnel, 1950; Wołk, 1976; Niethammer, 1977, 1978; Kraft & Pleyer, 1978; Illing, Illing & Kraft, 1981; Voesenek & van Bemmel, 1984; Kuvikova, 1985 a , 1987; DuPasquier & Cantoni, 1992; Rychlik, 1997). Apart from the work of Kuvikova (1985 b ) and Rychlik (2000, 2005), no field investigations of niche partitioning have been made of all four of these species living in syntopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also utilize similar habitat and food resources, suggesting that they require effective mechanisms to minimize competition in order to coexist (Pucek 1981; Spitzenberger 1990; Churchfield 1991; Kirkland 1991; Rychlik and Zwolak 2005). For example, habitat selection by the two species in Białowieża forest overlapped by about 90% (Rychlik 2000), their circadian activities by 99% (Rychlik 2005) and their diets by more than 80% (Churchfield and Rychlik 2006). Their similarity, their share habitats and their common resources suggest that the two species ought to respond similarly to selection when they are found sympatrically in a common environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%