2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2009.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P-glycoprotein deficient mouse in situ blood–brain barrier permeability and its prediction using an in combo PAMPA model

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to assess the permeability of mouse blood-brain barrier (BBB) to a diverse set of compounds in the absence of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) mediated efflux, to predict it using an in combo PAMPA model, and to explore its role in brain penetration classification (BPC). The initial brain uptake (K in ) of 19 compounds in both wild-type and Pgp mutant [mdr1a(−/−)] CF-1 mice was determined by the in situ brain perfusion technique. PAMPA measurements were performed, and the values were used to d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
86
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ignoring this [49,50], the logS-pH data above pH 7 might suggest that the pK a of haloperidol at 37 °C is 8.0. This would not be in agreement with the pK a 8.29 independently determined at 37 °C [60] and 8.60 at 25 °C [61]. Based solely on the solubility measurements, none of the three possibilities can be definitively ruled out, and additional investigation might be desirable.…”
Section: Haloperidolmentioning
confidence: 36%
“…Ignoring this [49,50], the logS-pH data above pH 7 might suggest that the pK a of haloperidol at 37 °C is 8.0. This would not be in agreement with the pK a 8.29 independently determined at 37 °C [60] and 8.60 at 25 °C [61]. Based solely on the solubility measurements, none of the three possibilities can be definitively ruled out, and additional investigation might be desirable.…”
Section: Haloperidolmentioning
confidence: 36%
“…However, as seen in Fig. 4A, no correlation is found between the in situ data extracted from Dagenais et al (2009) and the MDCK-MDR1 data extracted from the work of Di et al (2009) or generated in this study. As shown by Di et al, the MDCK-MDR1 data do not correlate with in situ perfusion data, and a number of compounds are detected as false positives and even more problematic false negatives (i.e., CNS drugs that are low or nonpermeating in the MDCK-MDR1 assay).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…4. Correlations between LogPS extracted from Dagenais et al (2009) and the different permeability models used in this work: apparent permeability measured using MDCK-MDR1 cells (A), logarithm of grasshopper brain concentration obtained after using 10 mM exposure concentration (B), logarithm of grasshopper brain concentration obtained after using 3 mM exposure concentration (C), logarithm of grasshopper brain concentration obtained after 3 mM exposure concentration + verapamil (D). Only compounds known not to be Pgp substrates are included in (B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4A). Using the same species and method, Dagenais and colleagues reported K in values for a variety of compounds (34). For comparison, the K in for the unconjugated anti-HER2 mAb is close to that of the antiviral drug ritonavir K in (3.0 Â 10 À4 mL/g/s), which is classified having low CNS penetration (35).…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%