2023
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pacing induced cardiomyopathy: recognition and management

Abstract: Right ventricle (RV) apex continues to remain as the standard pacing site in the ventricle due to ease of implantation, procedural safety and lack of convincing evidence of better clinical outcomes from non-apical pacing sites. Electrical dyssynchrony resulting in abnormal ventricular activation and mechanical dyssynchrony resulting in abnormal ventricular contraction during RV pacing can result in adverse LV remodelling predisposing some patients for recurrent heart failure (HF) hospitalisation, atrial arrhyt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also evaluated the association between the FIB-4 index and cardiovascular death as a secondary outcome. As mentioned earlier, RVP may significantly affect left ventricular contraction and valvular pathology due to its nonphysiological pacing pattern, increasing the risk of heart failure and atrial fibrillation [13]. Considering that the FIB-4 index may reflect the pathophysiology of circulatory failure, we hypothesized that there would be a significant association between the FIB-4 index and cardiovascular death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also evaluated the association between the FIB-4 index and cardiovascular death as a secondary outcome. As mentioned earlier, RVP may significantly affect left ventricular contraction and valvular pathology due to its nonphysiological pacing pattern, increasing the risk of heart failure and atrial fibrillation [13]. Considering that the FIB-4 index may reflect the pathophysiology of circulatory failure, we hypothesized that there would be a significant association between the FIB-4 index and cardiovascular death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, right ventricular pacing (RVP) was used for bradycardia arrhythmias; however, this was associated with problems like decreased left ventricular systolic function [1], increased hospitalization for heart failure [2], and the onset of atrial fibrillation [3] due to electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony. To address these issues, pacing techniques involving the His bundle or left bundle area have been recently introduced [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also evaluated the association between the FIB-4 index and cardiovascular death as a secondary outcome. As mentioned earlier, RVP may significantly affect left ventricular contraction and valvular pathology due to its non-physiological pacing pattern, increasing the risk of heart failure and atrial fibrillation [ 1 3 ]. Considering that the FIB-4 index may reflect the pathophysiology of circulatory failure, we hypothesized that there would be a significant association between the FIB-4 index and cardiovascular death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, right ventricular pacing (RVP) was used for bradycardia arrhythmias; however, it was associated with problems such as decreased left ventricular systolic function [ 1 ], increased hospitalization for heart failure [ 2 ], and the onset of atrial fibrillation [ 3 ] due to electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony. To address these issues, pacing techniques involving the His bundle or the left bundle area have recently been introduced [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have confirmed the ability of biventricular pacing to reverse the LV dilatation and dysfunction along with reduction in the severity of mitral regurgitation. 28 In a cohort of 69 PICM patients identified through systematic inclusion and careful screening for alternative causes of CM, CRT upgrade was associated with marked improvement in systolic function, with mean LVEF increasing from 29.3% to 45.2% and more than 70% achieved LVEF >35%. The benefits of CRT upgrade appear to be rapid, and most of LVEF improvement occurs within three months and more gradually over the remainder of the first year.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 97%