2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1505.00867
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packing and Covering Immersions in 4-Edge-Connected Graphs

Chun-Hung Liu

Abstract: A graph G contains another graph H as an immersion if H can be obtained from a subgraph of G by splitting off edges and removing isolated vertices. In this paper, we prove an edge-variant of the Erdős-Pósa property with respect to the immersion containment in 4-edge-connected graphs. More precisely, we prove that for every graph H, there exists a function f such that for every 4-edge-connected graph G, either G contains k pairwise edge-disjoint subgraphs where each containing H as an immersion, or there exists… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ideas were later used by Dvořák and Wollan [DW16] to give a similar result for the setting of excluding strong immersions; this is a di erent, but closely related embedding notion. The connections between tree-cut decompositions and wall immersions also turned out to be important in the proof of Liu of the Erdős-Pósa property for immersion models in 4-edgeconnected graphs [Liu15]. On the algorithmic side, Giannopoulou et al [GPR + 21] used the excluded wall immersion theorem of Wollan [Wol15] and the combinatorics of tree-cut decompositions to give linear kernels for edge deletion problems for immersion-closed classes that exclude at least one subcubic planar graph as an immersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These ideas were later used by Dvořák and Wollan [DW16] to give a similar result for the setting of excluding strong immersions; this is a di erent, but closely related embedding notion. The connections between tree-cut decompositions and wall immersions also turned out to be important in the proof of Liu of the Erdős-Pósa property for immersion models in 4-edgeconnected graphs [Liu15]. On the algorithmic side, Giannopoulou et al [GPR + 21] used the excluded wall immersion theorem of Wollan [Wol15] and the combinatorics of tree-cut decompositions to give linear kernels for edge deletion problems for immersion-closed classes that exclude at least one subcubic planar graph as an immersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• G has a bramble of order k; and • G has a tangle of order k. We remark that in the last point, we mean (appropriately de ned) tangles of edge separations: partitions of the vertex set, where the edges crossing the partition form the cutset. Tangles of this avor were already considered: Liu [Liu15] used them extensively in the setting of the Erdős-Pósa property for immersion models, while Diestel and Oum [DO19] gave a suitable tangle duality theorem for the parameter carving-width, which is related to tree-cut width.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very clean local version of a decomposition theorem for excluding any fixed graph as an immersion in 4-edge-connected graphs has been obtained by the author and successfully applied to prove an Erdős-Pósa type result for packing and covering immersions [17]. As the minor relation and immersion relation are equivalent for subcubic graphs, it can be shown that once edge-cuts 2 of order 3 are allowed, any sufficiently informative decomposition theorem with respect to immersion must be at least as complicated as Robertson and Seymour's decomposition theorem with respect to minors [28], so the complicated notion of nearly embedding is unavoidable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Theorem 1.6 shows that the class C mentioned in Theorem 1.6 is small and addable, all conclusions of Theorem 1.7 apply to C. Now we discuss the proof of Theorem 1.4. Though the global decomposition theorem for excluding minors can be easily derived from the local version [28], it is unclear how to use similar arguments to derive Theorem 1.4 from the local decomposition in [17]. So we use a strategy different from [28] to derive Theorem 1.4 from the results in [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation