2002
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2002)128:3(180)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pan Evaporation to Reference Evapotranspiration Conversion Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
52
1
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
52
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the ground flux is not included in subsequent analyses, which are instead based on the standard ETo estimates reported by CIMIS. CIMIS ETo estimates and nearby pan evaporation station data (E pan ) are well correlated at monthly scales (Table 1; see also Grismer et al 2002). However, the E pan rates are usually higher than their corresponding ETo estimates.…”
Section: Data a Meteorological Recordsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Therefore, the ground flux is not included in subsequent analyses, which are instead based on the standard ETo estimates reported by CIMIS. CIMIS ETo estimates and nearby pan evaporation station data (E pan ) are well correlated at monthly scales (Table 1; see also Grismer et al 2002). However, the E pan rates are usually higher than their corresponding ETo estimates.…”
Section: Data a Meteorological Recordsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…According GRISMER et al (2002), there are approximately, fifty methods for estimate ET0, which require distinct meteorological information, and therefore often produce inconsistent results. The Penman-Monteith method (ALLEN et al, 1998) has been recommended by the FAO as standard to calculate the ET0 and has been used worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the simpler techniques is to directly measure the water evaporation in the field from an evaporation pan, which is an apparently simple integrated measurement of complex meteorological interactions, such as solar radiation, temperature, humidity, and wind speed. Although pan evaporation cannot fully represent lake evaporation, it has been found as proportional to actual evaporation of moist surfaces, such as lakes or irrigated fields (Kahler and Brutsaert 2006), and also calculated reference crop evapotranspiration (Brouwer and Heibloem 1986;Grismer et al 2002;Snyder et al 2005;Ertek et al 2006). Because pans of various designs have produced data for many regions throughout the world for long periods, attempts have also been made to use these data to estimate actual evaporation even in non-moist environments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%