2015
DOI: 10.18202/jamal.2015.12.6028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradigma Interpretif pada Penelitian Akuntansi Indonesia

Abstract: Abstrak: Paradigma Interpretif pada Penelitian Akuntansi Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memperdalam pemahaman mengenai Penelitian Akuntansi Interpretif (PAI), memberikan penjelasan me ngenai keunggulan dan keterbatasan PAI dan menelisik kurangnya PAI di Indonesia berdasarkan penelitian yang terbit pada SNA, SNAV (2013SNAV ( -2015, dan jurnal akuntansi terakreditasi nasional (2012)(2013)(2014). Penelitian menggunakan metode studi kasus. Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik akuntansi yang berkaita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
9
0
14

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
9
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This research is a qualitative research influenced by the subjectivity of researchers and is not designed to be generalized [21]. In connection with the purpose of research and to explore the depth of experience of informants, qualitative research is the most appropriate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research is a qualitative research influenced by the subjectivity of researchers and is not designed to be generalized [21]. In connection with the purpose of research and to explore the depth of experience of informants, qualitative research is the most appropriate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenomenology is a qualitative study, in which researchers gather data by the triangulation method [13]. Phenomenology can be interpretive [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For research purposes in collecting data, 10 small-scale chicken farmers were identified as informants [16], [13]. The collected data were analyzed by SWOT [2], [18], interpretive [14], and relevant costs for decision marking [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melalui pendekatan fenomenologi realitas dibiarkan untuk terungkap secara alami (Gill, 2014). Dengan menggunakan studi fenomenologi yang mengunggulkan subjek tivitas, yang menekankan pengalaman ma nusia (Feyaerts & Vanheule, 2015;Vagle & Hofsess, 2016;Ziakas & Boukas, 2014), di harapkan dapat menyoroti hal penting pada suatu fenomena (Darmayasa & Aneswari, 2015). Hal ini dapat tercapai melalui sejum lah tahapan meliputi intentional analysis, epoche dan Eidetic reduction (Husserl, 1990;Sanders, 1982).…”
Section: Metodeunclassified