2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2009.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel machine scheduling with nested job assignment restrictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the time complexity of our algorithm is polynomial. Combining inequality (21) and Lemmas 13,15,18,19, and 20, we have…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the time complexity of our algorithm is polynomial. Combining inequality (21) and Lemmas 13,15,18,19, and 20, we have…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A typical machine scheduling model with this kind of assignment restriction appears in parallel machine models, where some machines are more flexible and can process more jobs, while other machines are less flexible and can process fewer jobs. For example, Ou et al [13] have studied such a scheduling problem with "inclusive processing sets," while Huo and Leung [14] and Muratore et al [15] have studied a more general model with "nested processing sets." Leung and Li [16] have provided a comprehensive survey of scheduling models with job assignment restrictions in general and inclusive/nested processing set restrictions in particular.…”
Section: M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) is a type of polynomial-time approximation algorithm with performance guarantee 1+ε for all ε>0 [13] [14]. Muratore et al [15] considered a scheduling problem in which jobs can be performed on a certain subset of the machines, where the machine sets are nested. They developed a polynomial-time approximation scheme to minimize makespan.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, offline problems P | M i (GoS) | C max and P | M i (nested) | C max have PTASs that are proposed by Ou et al (2008) and Muratore et al (2010), respectively. While the PTASs have very high running times, there are faster approximation algorithms with constant worst-case bounds for P | M i (GoS) | C max proposed by Ou et al (2008) and for P | M i (nested) | C max proposed by Huo and Leung (2010a), Huo and Leung (2010b).…”
Section: Makespanmentioning
confidence: 99%