2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-8999-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallelism error measurement for the spindle axis of machine tools by two circular tests with different tool lengths

Abstract: In this study, parallelism errors between the spindle axis and the linear axis of machine tools were measured using a double ball-bar. Specifically, two circular tests were performed to measure the parallelism errors using tool balls with different tool lengths and a workpiece ball fixed to a workpiece table. Parallelism errors were calculated by analyzing, simultaneously, the measured double ball-bar (DBB) data from the circular tests. The proposed method provides accurate measurements due to a large offset b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is proved that the relative displacement of the two vertical surfaces is only related to the distance of the detection line C relative to the datum surface, independent of the direction, and in line with the geometric relationship in the detection model in Figure 14. Based on the above analysis, the data in Figures 24 and 33 are substituted into Formulas (16) and (17) to obtain the calculated surface shape contours, as shown in Figure 34. It can be seen from Figure 34 that the calculated surface shape contour is different from the known surface shape contour, indicating that there exists a positional relation between the two surfaces.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is proved that the relative displacement of the two vertical surfaces is only related to the distance of the detection line C relative to the datum surface, independent of the direction, and in line with the geometric relationship in the detection model in Figure 14. Based on the above analysis, the data in Figures 24 and 33 are substituted into Formulas (16) and (17) to obtain the calculated surface shape contours, as shown in Figure 34. It can be seen from Figure 34 that the calculated surface shape contour is different from the known surface shape contour, indicating that there exists a positional relation between the two surfaces.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhattacharya et al [15] described an interferometric method for measuring the parallelism of an end face of a transparent material. Lee et al [16] developed a double ball-bar method to measure parallelism errors of the spindle axis of machine tools. Maurizio et al [17] discussed two methods for measuring the parallelism error of gauge blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison results are shown in figure 6. ∆X, ∆Y, and ∆Z represent the relative errors of the calculation results of equations ( 9) and (13). The error parameters involved in this calculation example are shown in equation (14):…”
Section: Error Model Of the Ij-tbbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By compensating the measurement errors, the volume error in the machine tool workspace is reduced, which enables the machine to have a higher machining accuracy. Lee et al [13] designed two measuring modes with different tool lengths based on the DBB to measure parallelism errors between the spindle axis and the linear axis of a machine tool. This low-cost and easy-toperform method needs only one DBB and an adjusting fixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%