2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterization of air temperature in high temporal and spatial resolution from a combination of the SEVIRI and MODIS instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
73
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
73
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the aggregation did have a noticeable effect on the linear regression (R 2 = 0.84, RSME = 1.54 K), where the slope become flatter than the 1:1 line and the y-intercept became positive and increased by 1.6 °C compared to the daily MMM result. The RMS error reported here for daily and aggregated MMM method is similar to that reported elsewhere [29]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the aggregation did have a noticeable effect on the linear regression (R 2 = 0.84, RSME = 1.54 K), where the slope become flatter than the 1:1 line and the y-intercept became positive and increased by 1.6 °C compared to the daily MMM result. The RMS error reported here for daily and aggregated MMM method is similar to that reported elsewhere [29]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…RMS errors ranged between 4.09 and 4.90 K (Table 2), which were approximately 1 to 2 K larger than typical when compared to air temperatures [29]. Variations in R 2 values did not correlate with distance of the interpolated diurnal curve form (Table 1) indicating factors other than spatial interpolation were playing a dominant role in correlation variability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zaksek and Schroedter-Homscheidt [2] proposed a model to obtain SAT that considered solar incidence parameters and the terrain curvature, with a term defined as the difference between station elevation and mean elevation within 20 km vicinity (∆h). We computed topographic aspects and slopes (φ t ,s), h, Lat, distance to coast (dist) as a measurement of continentally, and ∆h for each station from a 50-m digital elevation model (DEM) to analyze the SAT dependences on them.…”
Section: Geographical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitoring of SAT patterns can also improve meteorological model results by using them as input data. Additionally, extreme SATs have health consequences, increase electricity loads, and result in reduced crop yields [2]. SAT is usually measured by meteorological stations and thus SAT data are limited by the density and distribution of available station networks [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%