2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10593-2_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterizing Object Detectors in the Continuous Pose Space

Abstract: Abstract. Object detection and pose estimation are interdependent problems in computer vision. Many past works decouple these problems, either by discretizing the continuous pose and training pose-specific object detectors, or by building pose estimators on top of detector outputs. In this paper, we propose a structured kernel machine approach to treat object detection and pose estimation jointly in a mutually benificial way. In our formulation, a unified, continuously parameterized, discriminative appearance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, our Mean Absolut Error (MAE) is approximately 80% smaller with respect to the results published in [11], which is the most accurate method on this dataset so far. As the results in the first two columns show, the overall mean is strongly affected by few yet detrimental 180…”
Section: Toy Example -Epfl Datasetcontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, our Mean Absolut Error (MAE) is approximately 80% smaller with respect to the results published in [11], which is the most accurate method on this dataset so far. As the results in the first two columns show, the overall mean is strongly affected by few yet detrimental 180…”
Section: Toy Example -Epfl Datasetcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…We compare our method to six single-frame state-of-theart pose estimators [3,2,11,10,22,19] and one videobased approach that has been recently proposed [20] used the same testing framework as previous works, i.e., two different splits for training and testing. (i) 50% Split: training the model on the first 10 sequences and testing it on the remaining 10; (ii) Leave-One-Out: training the model on 19 sequences and testing it on the remaining one.…”
Section: Toy Example -Epfl Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [26], normalized faces are used to train an auto-associative memory using the Widrow-Hoff correction rule in order to classify head poses. In one of the most recent works [27], the authors consider that object detection and continuous pose estimation are interdependent problems and they jointly formulate them as a structured prediction problem, by learning a single and continuously parameterized object appearance model over the entire pose space. After that, they design a cascaded discretecontinuous inference algorithm to effectively optimize a non-convex objective, by generating a diverse proposal to explore the complicated search space.…”
Section: Appearance-based Head Pose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each of the current approaches has its own weaknesses: Many of these approaches [5,13,1,35] rely on a depth sensor, which would fail on metallic objects or outdoor scenes; methods based on feature points [25,17] expect textured objects; those based on edges [4,39] are sensitive to cluttered background; most of these methods [13,27,30,38,11,45,20] are not robust to occlusion. We also want a method fast enough for interactive 3D applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%