2014
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110201747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental Ease in Asking Others Not to Smoke and Respiratory Symptoms and Illness among Children

Abstract: Objective: Childhood exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) increases a child’s burden of respiratory conditions, but parental smoking bans may reduce such morbidity. This study evaluated household smoking bans and their relationship to respiratory illness in an outpatient otolaryngology clinic. Methods: The study was performed at the Heim Pal National Children’s Hospital, Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Department (Budapest, Hungary) from July to November, 2010. A consecutive series of children’s caregivers we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure to ETS was more common in children undergoing tonsillectomy for recurrent tonsillitis compared to a control group who underwent hernia repair surgery [33]. Children whose parents limited their exposure to ETS by enforcing smoke-free home environments experienced fewer URTIs and decreased health-care facility visits [34,35] (Table 2). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exposure to ETS was more common in children undergoing tonsillectomy for recurrent tonsillitis compared to a control group who underwent hernia repair surgery [33]. Children whose parents limited their exposure to ETS by enforcing smoke-free home environments experienced fewer URTIs and decreased health-care facility visits [34,35] (Table 2). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children whose parents limited their exposure to ETS by enforcing smoke-free home environments experienced fewer URTIs and decreased health-care facility visits [34,35] (Table 2). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the person communicating seeks to influence behavior through direct interpersonal verbal intervention (i.e., assertive communication). Past research has examined correlates of asking others not to smoke in a general context (e.g., Brownson, Davis, Wilkerson, & Jackson-Thompson, 1994;Elder et al, 1992), and also focused on more specific locations, such as workplaces (Sivri, Lazuras, Rodafinos, & Eiser, 2013), homes (Spangler, Csákányi, Rogers, & Katona, 2014) and colleges (Brann & Sutton, 2009;Choo & Kim, 2011). However, to our knowledge, no published studies examine psychosocial correlates of intentions to ask others not to smoke or vape in the kinds of public venues that are increasingly smoke-free (e.g., bars, restaurants, and parks), nor have any studies directly compared communication intentions surrounding vaping and smoking.…”
Section: Assertive Communication About Smoking and Vapingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be more difficult to ask friends not to smoke around in friends' homes than to ask them not to smoke in one's own home. 41 The 'unavoidable' SHS exposure in friends' home may immediately cause disturbance which was reflected by the lower scores on social functioning in our sample where participants with exposure were more likely to feel interfered with their social activities (like visiting friends). Nonetheless, lower scores on role physical and role emotional domains were found in participants exposed to SHS in their own homes which indicated their daily life was adversely affected by SHS exposure, even the effect was not reflected in the summary score (MCS12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This might reflect the feeling of helplessness where people have less control over the external environment than their homes. It may be more difficult to ask friends not to smoke around in friends’ homes than to ask them not to smoke in one's own home 41. The ‘unavoidable’ SHS exposure in friends’ home may immediately cause disturbance which was reflected by the lower scores on social functioning in our sample where participants with exposure were more likely to feel interfered with their social activities (like visiting friends).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%