1995
DOI: 10.1136/fn.73.3.f135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental factors in cognitive outcome of non-handicapped low birthweight infants.

Abstract: A population based cohort of 144 children weighing less than 2000 g who were without major handicap, and a random control sample of 163 children born at term and weighing over 3000 g were investigated. The aim was to assess the relative importance for cognitive development at 5 years of age, of birthweight, parental demographic factors, and factors related to the environment in which the child was reared. The mean non-verbal IQ was 6 1 points lower (95% CI, 2-3 to 10) for the low birthweight (LBW) group, but t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
54
4
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
54
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The subjects have been followed closely during childhood and puberty, with 3 major clinical and psychological assessments at age 5, 15, and 19 years. [18][19][20] Because no brain imaging had been performed during the 2 first follow-ups, we found it reasonable to add a head MR imaging at age 19 years, when the brain maturation is nearly completed. The study participants were invited to undergo an MR imaging and for the present radiologic follow-up at age 19, we included 113 LBW survivors (65% of the initial cohort) and 100 controls.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The subjects have been followed closely during childhood and puberty, with 3 major clinical and psychological assessments at age 5, 15, and 19 years. [18][19][20] Because no brain imaging had been performed during the 2 first follow-ups, we found it reasonable to add a head MR imaging at age 19 years, when the brain maturation is nearly completed. The study participants were invited to undergo an MR imaging and for the present radiologic follow-up at age 19, we included 113 LBW survivors (65% of the initial cohort) and 100 controls.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20] In total, 44 were excluded (22 died and 22 had major handicaps or cerebral palsy) and of the 173 eligible survivors 134 participated in the clinical followup. 18,21 The controls were randomly selected from an age-matched population of neonates with a GA of Ͼ37 weeks, a BW Ͼ3000 g, and without any need for assisted support in the neonatal period. The subjects have been followed closely during childhood and puberty, with 3 major clinical and psychological assessments at age 5, 15, and 19 years.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While home environment appears to play an important role in the cognitive and academic outcome of high risk infants, findings are inconsistent with regard to its influence on motor skills. 46 However, Goyen and Lui 13 found that the development of gross motor skills appears to be differentially influenced by the home environment, with infants from lower socio-economic groups performing significantly poorer than their wealthier counterparts. This may subsequently impact on the general intellectual functioning of these infants as motor development during these formative years provides a foundation for subsequent development and optimises occupational performance in the areas of self-care, learning, recreation and play.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depuis une vingtaine d'années, de nombreuses études se sont intéressées au déve-loppment de l'enfant né prématurément et en particulier à celui de fonctions complexes comme le langage et la lecture [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Plus l'enfant grandit, et plus il devient difficile d'extraire l'impact de la prématurité sur les apprentissages. Cependant tous les auteurs ayant pris en compte les facteurs environnementaux constatent l'importance de cette variable associée à la prématurité [3,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified