IntroductionMaternal level of education and profession have not been well researched as mediating factors in infant development. The impact of maternal employment on child development remains a topic of much informal debate. Mothers who have a tertiary education are likely to enter professional occupations, and subsequently to belong to a middle to high socioeconomic group. This in turn influences access to financial resources, diet, health care and sanitary facilities, quality of education, exposure to books and technology, and familiarity with Western cultural mores, which are all likely to have an effect on child development and psychological functioning. 1,2,3 However, it has been demonstrated that maternal employment during the first three years of a child's life has a deleterious (albeit small) effect on the child's intellectual development. 4 The general increase in the employment of women over the past few years, together with the increase in single parent households, is suggested to afford parents less time and energy to invest in their children. Consequently, this paper reports on the results of a comparison between the performance of infants with educated, professionally employed mothers versus those with less educated, nonprofessional mothers, on the Griffiths Mental Development The study compared the performance on the Griffiths Mental Development Scales of Black, South African infants with mothers who had twelve or more years of education and who were professionally employed with infants of mothers with fewer than twelve years of education and who were employed in non-professional jobs. Method: The sample consisted of 40 infants (aged 13-16 months), to whom the Griffiths Mental Development Scales was administered. Results: The infants with professional mothers performed significantly better than their counterparts with non-professional mothers on the General Quotient, as well as on the Locomotor Scale. While maternal level of education did not appear to distinguish between infants in terms of social, fine motor, language, hearing, processing speed or practical reasoning, it did discriminate in terms of gross-motor functioning. Conclusion: It is suggested that, as the infant develops, the skills assessed by the Griffiths Scales, which are initially differentiated, become increasingly interrelated. Consequently, poor gross-motor skills, which may be more likely in infants from a low socio-economic status, may have far-reaching implications. Thus, it is important to consider maternal level of education and the socio-economic status background of the infant, as this may influence overall performance on the Scales.