1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00756915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle production from signature change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
94
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
9
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our proposal, the study of the change of signature becomes the simple geometrical analysis of imbedded submanifolds in the bulk: a well-posed mathematical problem without pathologies. It is remarkable that many of the traditional ad hoc assumptions concerning signature change [10] are shown to become pure necessary conditions in the brane case, which indirectly proves the plausibility of our idea and makes it worth exploring it, possibly sheding some light into the "signature-change controversy" [10].Whether a signature change occurred in our effective spacetime is debatable, and several independent works have considered this possibility [12,11]. From a classical viewpoint, a signature change may serve to avoid the singularities of general relativity [13], such as the big-bang, which might be replaced by a Euclidean region prior to the birth of time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In our proposal, the study of the change of signature becomes the simple geometrical analysis of imbedded submanifolds in the bulk: a well-posed mathematical problem without pathologies. It is remarkable that many of the traditional ad hoc assumptions concerning signature change [10] are shown to become pure necessary conditions in the brane case, which indirectly proves the plausibility of our idea and makes it worth exploring it, possibly sheding some light into the "signature-change controversy" [10].Whether a signature change occurred in our effective spacetime is debatable, and several independent works have considered this possibility [12,11]. From a classical viewpoint, a signature change may serve to avoid the singularities of general relativity [13], such as the big-bang, which might be replaced by a Euclidean region prior to the birth of time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The problem of finding a generalization of general relativity which includes degenerate metrics has been studied in the past, motivated by the consideration of a class of metrics, the so called signature-changing metrics [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,46,37,38,39] , which give a classical realization of the change of signature in quantum cosmology conjectured by Hartle and Hawking [40,41,42,43,44]. The classical change of signature for a homogeneous, isotropic and spatially flat universe is realized by a metric tensor defined by the following line element…”
Section: Isochronous Cosmologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have proposed a formalism to deal with initial conditions formulated in Euclidean regimes, showing how they can be translated into initial conditions in the Lorentzian sector by means of the vacuum evolution and suitable continuity conditions in the process of signature change, making the framework compatible with the selection of a Fock quantization based on the uniqueness criterion that we have put forward. The continuity conditions that we have suggested are inspired by the works of Dray et al [36], in which particle production is proven to occur for a massless scalar field propagating in a signature changing spacetime, consisting of a Euclidean region between two Lorentzian parts of the spacetime. In addition, an extensive discussion about signature changing events and their consequences in Bose-Einstein condensates can be found in Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that point, it is necessary to provide matching conditions relating the considered solution for the field to another one in the Lorentzian region beyond the signature change. In order to do this, we adopt the ideas presented by Dray et al [36], which require continuity for the KG field and its time derivative on the hypersurface where the signature flips. An extended analysis can also be found in Ref.…”
Section: A Matching Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%