2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle swarm optimization and opposite-based particle swarm optimization for two-agent multi-facility customer order scheduling with ready times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study m was chosen as equal to 15, which is lower than the number of particles suggested by [53], i.e., 20-50, since these require considerable computing resources which were not available for the present study. However, it has been reported that there are no drawbacks from using a lower number of particles provided that this is higher than the number of parameters [53,54], which was nine in our case. Each particle can modify its position and velocity based on both the best point in current generation (p id ) and the best point of all particles in the swarm (p gd ).…”
Section: Pso Algorithm For Aquacrop Model Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In this study m was chosen as equal to 15, which is lower than the number of particles suggested by [53], i.e., 20-50, since these require considerable computing resources which were not available for the present study. However, it has been reported that there are no drawbacks from using a lower number of particles provided that this is higher than the number of parameters [53,54], which was nine in our case. Each particle can modify its position and velocity based on both the best point in current generation (p id ) and the best point of all particles in the swarm (p gd ).…”
Section: Pso Algorithm For Aquacrop Model Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For the specific two machines/components case and weighted jobs, Sung and Yoon (1998) propose some constructive heuristics. Finally, Lin et al (2017) address the version with interfering jobs,…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015) and Lin et al. (2017) present a honeybee optimization algorithm and a particle swarm optimization algorithm for the problem of two‐agent single‐machine scheduling problem, respectively. In this study, a three‐agent problem is considered and a novel evolutionary‐based reference point determination of NSGA‐III (ERNSGA‐III) is used to solve it.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%