Partisipasi Masyarakat Lokal dalam Pengembangan Kawasan Pariwisata Candidasa

Abstract


 
 
 This article examines the local community participation in the Candidasa tourism area, Karangasem, Bali. The objectives are to identify the capital exchange practice of local communities with the tourism industry and then determine the type of local communities’ participation in the development of Candidasa tourism area. The community based tourism approach adopted to understand the phenomenon of local community participation. Based on observations and interviews can be addressed that the communities surrounding the Candidasa relatively have an exhaustive capital. However, the comprehensiveness of such capital is not accompanied by the proper capital exchange strategies by indigenous village institution as a representation of local communities. The local communities only get relief materials from tourism as a result of the capital exchange. Accordance with the practice of capital exchange, it can be said that this type of local community participation is included in the participation for material incentives. This type of community participation is still relatively limited, so it necessary to improve the their involvement into tourism development in Candidasa.
 
 

Indigenous People Between Recognition and Disclaimer of Legal Pluralism Perspective

“…(Dewi, 2013), There is a subordination of the local government of the Tabanan district to the indigenous people in the revenue-sharing system for managing Jatiluwih tourism assets. (Adikampana, I. M., Pujani, L. P. K., & Nugroho, 2015), The profit sharing system between the local government of Karangasem Regency and the native Candidasa is through the provision of incentives that are classified as low through sharing funds. A number of problems of injustice to the indigenous population reflect the phenomenon of weak legal politics as in the view of (Griffiths, 2005), there is denial of efforts to reorganize a democratic national legal system (Tamanaha, 2004) and the semi-autonomous social field (Sally Falk Moore, 1978), Upholding the integration value of legal pluralism which was built in the midst of pluralism for the purpose of comprehensively realizing justice, benefit and certainty for indigenous people.…”