1974
DOI: 10.1063/1.1682155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partitioning of excess energy in dissociative resonance capture processes

Abstract: The translational energies of selected negative ions formed by dissociative resonance capture processes from the polyatomic systems NF3, BF3, CF4, C2F6, C3F8, and c-C4F8 have been measured as functions of excess energy over the resonances. The excess energy in the molecular negative ion intermediate prior to dissociation has been calculated and partitioned into translational, vibrational, and, in some cases, electronic excitation of the dissociation products. The degree of vibrational activation in the interme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
70
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These necessitated them to use a crossed beam geometry and an efficient solution to these problems was to use a segmented time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer along with the pulsed-electron-beam and pulsed-ion-extraction techniques and the relative flow technique. The results of Harland and Franklin 19 and Nandi et al 20 agree well with each other in the positions of the resonance peaks, but the magnitude show the differences as nearly big as a factor of four. For example, the cross sections of the formation of F − are 0.…”
Section: Electron Attachment (Dea) Cross Sectionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These necessitated them to use a crossed beam geometry and an efficient solution to these problems was to use a segmented time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer along with the pulsed-electron-beam and pulsed-ion-extraction techniques and the relative flow technique. The results of Harland and Franklin 19 and Nandi et al 20 agree well with each other in the positions of the resonance peaks, but the magnitude show the differences as nearly big as a factor of four. For example, the cross sections of the formation of F − are 0.…”
Section: Electron Attachment (Dea) Cross Sectionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…There are only two published reports, relevant to this evaluation purpose, on the absolute measurements of the dissociative electron attachment (DEA) cross sections for NF 3 : Harland and Franklin 19 and Nandi et al 20 Other than these, Chantry reported the DEA cross sections for NF 3 at a conference and the results were also contained in a book 21 but were not published in a journal, and therefore, this will not be discussed any further here. There are two experimental determinations of the electron attachment coefficient in swarms, 54,55 , but the two results are not consistent with each other and it is unclear which is more reliable.…”
Section: Electron Attachment (Dea) Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…ciative electron attachments, [6][7][8] grand total cross section (TCS) measured by Szmytkowski et al, 9 and calculated ionization and TCS with an independent atom model by Vinodkumar et al 10 Angular differential-vibrational excitation of BF 3 for symmetry stretching v 1 and degenerate stretching v 3 modes were reported as a function of the electron energy with a crossed-beam method by Tronc et al 11 As far as elastic differential cross sections (DCSs) and integral cross sections (ICSs) are concerned, we note a few theoretical studies on multi-scattering Xα-calculation of the unoccupied a ′′ 2 , a ′ 1 , and e ′ molecular orbitals of BF 3 and BCl 3 by Tossel et al 12 which are compared with electron transmission spectroscopy (ETS) measurements as well as R-matrix calculations by Radmilović-Radjenović 13 on the elastic scattering and electronic excitation of BF 3 by low energy electrons. More recently, the Schwinger multichannel (SMC) method was employed in the static-exchange (SE) and the static-exchange-polarization (SEP) approximations in the energy range from 0.1 to 10 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%