Fisheries Management 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470996072.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partnerships Towards Sustainable use of Australia's Northern Prawn Fishery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our estimate of around 5000 t of annual bycatch shows that, despite the JBG occupying only 5% of the NPF managed area and having restricted fishing times (due to tidal influences on prawn abundance), it contributes about 11% to the 47,000 t of bycatch estimated to be taken each year in this fishery (Pender et al, 1992). This percentage is likely to be conservative considering the significant reduction in effort in other regions of the NPF since the 47,000 t estimate was made (Dichmont et al, 2007), and the introduction of Bycatch Reduction Devices (BRDs) and Turtle Exclusion Devices (TEDs), which remove many of the larger animals from the catch (Brewer et al, 2006). This high bycatch take and the unique species assemblage with temporal variability is very different to other high trawl effort regions in the NPF, such as the Gulf of Carpentaria (see Stobutzki et al, 2001a) and will need to be considered independently within the long-term bycatch monitoring program currently being implemented in this fishery.…”
Section: Implications For Bycatch Managementmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our estimate of around 5000 t of annual bycatch shows that, despite the JBG occupying only 5% of the NPF managed area and having restricted fishing times (due to tidal influences on prawn abundance), it contributes about 11% to the 47,000 t of bycatch estimated to be taken each year in this fishery (Pender et al, 1992). This percentage is likely to be conservative considering the significant reduction in effort in other regions of the NPF since the 47,000 t estimate was made (Dichmont et al, 2007), and the introduction of Bycatch Reduction Devices (BRDs) and Turtle Exclusion Devices (TEDs), which remove many of the larger animals from the catch (Brewer et al, 2006). This high bycatch take and the unique species assemblage with temporal variability is very different to other high trawl effort regions in the NPF, such as the Gulf of Carpentaria (see Stobutzki et al, 2001a) and will need to be considered independently within the long-term bycatch monitoring program currently being implemented in this fishery.…”
Section: Implications For Bycatch Managementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Being able to demonstrate ecological sustainability is increasingly important to managers of many of the world's fisheries (Hall and Mainprize, 2005;Dichmont et al, 2007). A growing body of literature confirms many types of fishing have a significant effect on non-target populations, habitats and communities (Sainsbury, 1987;Hall, 1996;Pauly et al, 2001;Kaiser et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introduction and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) is one of Australia's most valuable commercial fisheries (Dichmont et al 2007). The fishery targets two main species-groups of prawns [shrimp], banana prawns (Penaeus (Fenneropenaeus) merguiensis) and tiger prawns (P. esculentus and P. semisulcatus).…”
Section: Study Area and Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the compulsory use of turtle exclusion and bycatch reduction devices (Brewer et al. 2006), implementation of a bycatch monitoring programme, a voluntary ban of shark fining, spatial/seasonal closures and reductions in fishing effort (Kenyon, Jarrett, Bishop, Taranto, Dichmont & Zhou 2005; Dichmont, Loneragan, Brewer & Poiner 2007; Brewer et al. 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of important management actions has been implemented for assessing and reducing impacts on bycatch in the NPF, especially in the last 15 years (see Brewer, Heales, Griffiths, Haywood, Milton, Blaber, Jones & Stobutski 2008). These include the compulsory use of turtle exclusion and bycatch reduction devices (Brewer et al 2006), implementation of a bycatch monitoring programme, a voluntary ban of shark fining, spatial/seasonal closures and reductions in fishing effort (Kenyon, Jarrett, Bishop, Taranto, Dichmont & Zhou 2005;Dichmont, Loneragan, Brewer & Poiner 2007;Brewer et al 2008). These developments have been important components to managing the fishery.…”
Section: Implications For Bycatch Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%