2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0007123409990469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party Policy and Group Affiliation in the European Parliament

Abstract: While much attention has been paid to party politics in the European Parliament (EP), systematic empirical research has yet explained the basis on which national parties affiliate with the EP political groups. Our paper addresses this lacuna in three ways. First, we use empirical measures on party positions to demonstrate that EP party groups consist of national parties that share similar policy positions. Second, we explain party group as driven by policy congruence, using Bayesian/MCMC methods to estimate th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
95
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hix et al 2007) and on ideological congruence (McElroy and Benoit 2010;2012). However, the similarity in our research findings was not a foregone conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hix et al 2007) and on ideological congruence (McElroy and Benoit 2010;2012). However, the similarity in our research findings was not a foregone conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…McElroy and Benoit examine the ideological cohesion of national parties in EP party groups based on expert judgements of those parties' ideological positions (McElroy and Benoit 2010;2012). Thomassen and Schmitt (1999;see also Thomassen et al 2004) use data from surveys of MEPs to determine how cohesive and distinctive party groups are in relation to a set of broad policy questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logic of spatial analysis (Enelow and Hinich 1984;McElroy and Benoit 2010) is that each national party should join a group whose members are closest to its own programme. A multinational party group can be representative if the programmes that their national parties put to their respective electorates are collectively in agreement.…”
Section: Theories About How Aggregation Affects Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while there are no available policy alternatives as the basis of voting decision in EP elections since there are no pan-European political parties competing for the votes of a pan-European electorate, Thomassen (2009b: 14) suggests that focusing on the feasibility of an effective party government model, the relevant question becomes whether "national party systems can be aggregated into distinct and cohesive European party groups". McElroy and Benoit (2010) analyse the determinants of EP party group affiliation and show that party group choice is largely driven by policy congruence, while the organisation of and switching between EP party groups is determined largely by decisions to minimise the incongruence between the national and European levels. This suggests that even if the electorate makes decisions in the EP elections based on national issues and votes for parties based on their positions on national issues, this may serve the function of a good informational shortcut for voters.…”
Section: Background and Original Expectations Regarding Direct Electimentioning
confidence: 99%