2019
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.35.6.408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathological discrepancy between colposcopic directed cervical biopsy and conisation results: A five years experience of a single center in Turkey

Abstract: Objective:To analyze the clinical outcomes and treatment strategies of patients who underwent conisation in a tertiary hospital clinicMethods:The study was designed as a retrospective cohort study. Retrospective data’s of 176 patients who underwent conisation due to detection of dysplasia via colposcopic biopsy or cytology-histology discrepancy between 2012 and 2017 were collected. Colposcopy guided biopsies were performed according to HPV positivity and/or abnormal smear results in Izmir Katip Celebi Universi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature indicates less discrepancy between cervical biopsy and conization results relative to smear and conization. Aydogmus et al [22], report a 36% discrepancy between cervical biopsy and conization results. The prospective study of Peousis et al [23], compares the results of colposcopy, punch biopsy and conization and report the discrepancy between cervical biopsy and conization results accompanied by colposcopy as 36.6% (38/104).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The literature indicates less discrepancy between cervical biopsy and conization results relative to smear and conization. Aydogmus et al [22], report a 36% discrepancy between cervical biopsy and conization results. The prospective study of Peousis et al [23], compares the results of colposcopy, punch biopsy and conization and report the discrepancy between cervical biopsy and conization results accompanied by colposcopy as 36.6% (38/104).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%