2018
DOI: 10.21615/cesp.11.2.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patrones de correlación de fluencias semánticas y fonológicas en niños en edad escolar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the s-VFT Animals was associated with the organizational strategies linked to the lexical-associative component of verbal fluency, the p-VFTs found differences in errors and in organizational strategies linked to the executive component of verbal fluency. In both cases, the variations respond to the main components of each of the tasks (Fumagalli et al, 2018). Semantic variations indicate involvement of the temporal lobe (associative) and phonological variations of the frontal lobe (executive) in neuropsychology (Troyer et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the s-VFT Animals was associated with the organizational strategies linked to the lexical-associative component of verbal fluency, the p-VFTs found differences in errors and in organizational strategies linked to the executive component of verbal fluency. In both cases, the variations respond to the main components of each of the tasks (Fumagalli et al, 2018). Semantic variations indicate involvement of the temporal lobe (associative) and phonological variations of the frontal lobe (executive) in neuropsychology (Troyer et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the semantically performed clusters, jungle animals predominated. As Fumagalli et al (2018) explain, lexical access and selection follow certain patterns that allow for examining the organization of the semantic memory. In this sense, the items included in the semantic subcategory of jungle animals correspond to the most frequent and typical lexical concepts of the sample, and the absence of clusters such as desert animals, furry animals and cargo suggests the influence of culture on familiarity with the words that make up each category (Aizpurua & Lizaso, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes substantial differences in the preferred words for everyday objects such as "car" (auto instead of coche), "cellphone" (celular instead of móvil), and "money" (plata vs. dinero), and in the relative meaning frequencies for homonyms (chucho means "dog" in Iberian Spanish, "cold shiver" in Rioplatense Spanish) (Armstrong et al, 2016). These ubiquitous lexical differences justify the construction of specific lexical norms for different Spanish dialectal variants (Fumagalli et al, 2017;Manoiloff et al, 2010;Sarli & Justel, 2021;Vivas et al, 2017). This work introduces the "Small World of Words" free association norms for Rioplatense Spanish (SWOW-RP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%