2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/4205027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCG Classification Using Multidomain Features and SVM Classifier

Abstract: This paper proposes a method using multidomain features and support vector machine (SVM) for classifying normal and abnormal heart sound recordings. The database was provided by the PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2016. A total of 515 features are extracted from nine feature domains, i.e., time interval, frequency spectrum of states, state amplitude, energy, frequency spectrum of records, cepstrum, cyclostationarity, high-order statistics, and entropy. Correlation analysis is conducted to quantify the feature discrim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of normal (9857) and abnormal samples (3158) results in degrading the performance of the model [34]. Author Sensitivity% Specificity% Accuracy% Tang et al [19] 88.00 87.00 88.00 Dominguez et al [12] 93.20 95.12 97.00 Bradley et al [11] 90.07 88.45 89.26 Mostafa et al [13] 76.96 88.31 82.63 Masun et al [14] 79.60 80.60 80.10 Plesinger et al [17] 89.00 81.60 85.00 Vykintas et al [20] 80.63 87.66 84.15 Wei et al [21] 98.33 84.67 91.50 Philip et al [24] 77.00 80.00 79.00 Singh et al [33] 93.00 90.00 90.00 This study 94.08 91.95 92.47…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variation of normal (9857) and abnormal samples (3158) results in degrading the performance of the model [34]. Author Sensitivity% Specificity% Accuracy% Tang et al [19] 88.00 87.00 88.00 Dominguez et al [12] 93.20 95.12 97.00 Bradley et al [11] 90.07 88.45 89.26 Mostafa et al [13] 76.96 88.31 82.63 Masun et al [14] 79.60 80.60 80.10 Plesinger et al [17] 89.00 81.60 85.00 Vykintas et al [20] 80.63 87.66 84.15 Wei et al [21] 98.33 84.67 91.50 Philip et al [24] 77.00 80.00 79.00 Singh et al [33] 93.00 90.00 90.00 This study 94.08 91.95 92.47…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kamson et al [18] segmented heart sounds based on a modified hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM) with an average F 1 score of 98.38%. Tang et al [19] derived the multimodal features based on the HSMM segmentation method and predicted the abnormality of heart sounds using the SVM classifier. Bradley et al [11] extracted the features using sparse coding and time domain followed by classification based on the SVM classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Make the data linear separable in high dimensional space. Two hyperplanes based on kernel function are obtained by solving Equations (11) and (12). The decision rule of TWSVM is that the testing sample point belongs to the class which hyperplane is close to it.…”
Section: B Twin Support Vector Machine (Twsvm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They extracted a total of 515 features from nine feature domains. The experimental results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and overall score were 0.88, 0.87, and 0.88, respectively [12]. Bozkurt Baris et al proposed the algorithm based on CNN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of the winner solution of the challenge proposed to join the advantages of a neural network model that analysed raw data and a classical boosting classifier fed with time and frequency domain features [ 19 ]. The runner-up approach authors utilised a large set of different acoustic features extracted from various feature domains fed into a support vector machine (SVM) classifier [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%