2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2009.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedestrians at the kerb – Recognising the action intentions of humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
135
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
12
135
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They can be classified as driver cues (such as eye contact) and vehicle cues (such as speed or stopping distance) [9,23,26,28].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They can be classified as driver cues (such as eye contact) and vehicle cues (such as speed or stopping distance) [9,23,26,28].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedestrians rely on vehicle speed and distance to judge both the awareness and the intent of the driver [26,29,32]. A study conducted by Risto et al [24] found that vehicle and pedestrian behavior are purposely communicative.…”
Section: The Significance Of Motion Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pedestrians who want to cross the street without a crossing aid use eye contact to ensure that an approaching driver sees them. If the driver returns the eye contact, pedestrians assume that they have been seen and that the driver will act accordingly [7].…”
Section: Facial Expressions and Eye Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the multiplication of these means of transport highlights the problem of vulnerable road users which has led to the introduction of the "principe de prudence" (principle of caution) toward them in the Highway Code of July 2008 ("The principle of caution of the user toward the most vulnerable" Act of 2008-754, July 30, 2008. The pedestrian is particularly exposed in the field of accidentology and has been the subject of studies using different approaches (Gaymard, Andrés, & Nzobounsana, 2011;Gaymard, Boucher, Nzobounsana, Greffier, & Fournela, 2012;Holland & Hill, 2007;Khan, Jawaid, Chotoni, & Luby, 1999;Krotosky & Trivedi, 2007;Maeda et al, 2009;Schmidt & Färber, 2009;Thompson, Fraser & Howarth, 1985). However, as Tom, Auberlet, and Brémond (2008) point out, pedestrian-vehicle interactions are not analyzed by most of the simulation models even though these interactions are crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%