2004
DOI: 10.1021/es040548w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Reviewed: Defining Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility of Contaminated Soil and Sediment is Complicated

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
293
0
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 581 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
293
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to adsorption processes even aerobic biodegradation is often incomplete or significantly slowed down (Fenger et al 1973;Boethling 1984;Tezel et al 2006) and overall rather poor (Hegstad et al 2010a), likely due to sorption processes reducing the bioaccessibility of QAACs. Usually, a portion of the total concentration of a pollutant in soil may be taken up by microorganisms, commonly equated with the so-called bioavailable or bioaccessible fraction (Semple et al 2004;Hatzinger and Alexander 1995;Jechalke et al 2014). This fraction declines usually much faster with time than the total concentration of a pollutant in soil.…”
Section: Persistence Of Qaacs In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to adsorption processes even aerobic biodegradation is often incomplete or significantly slowed down (Fenger et al 1973;Boethling 1984;Tezel et al 2006) and overall rather poor (Hegstad et al 2010a), likely due to sorption processes reducing the bioaccessibility of QAACs. Usually, a portion of the total concentration of a pollutant in soil may be taken up by microorganisms, commonly equated with the so-called bioavailable or bioaccessible fraction (Semple et al 2004;Hatzinger and Alexander 1995;Jechalke et al 2014). This fraction declines usually much faster with time than the total concentration of a pollutant in soil.…”
Section: Persistence Of Qaacs In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it was concluded that chemical extractions of metals from multi-contaminated soils did not provide enough information about their bioavailable fractions (Alexander 2000;Ehlers and Luthy 2003;Semple et al 2004;Harmsen 2007) and were not able to reflect the toxicity of all substances in soil, their synergic and antagonistic effects and their interactions with the soil matrix and organisms (Gruiz 2005). In this context, th e application of batteries of terrestrial ecotoxicity tests gained special relevance as complementary, inexpensive, simple and quick tools able to report realistic and nonoverestimated effects of contaminated sites to soil organisms (Leitgib et al 2007;Alvarenga et al 2008;Maisto et al 2011;Alvarenga et al 2012;Agnieszka et al 2014;Bes et al 2014;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often total metal concentrations are used, taking for granted that environmental risk assessment based on the total concentrations can overestimate risks, and that organisms respond only to the fraction that is biologically available (Alexander, 2000;Ehlers and Luthy, 2003;Semple et al, 2004). Methods to assess available metal concentrations often use extraction with water or a dilute salt solution, but question is: do they really predict "biological availability"?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%