Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik Dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Di Indonesia)

Retnaningsih, Sonyendah; Nasution, Disriani Latifah Soroinda; Velentina, Rouli Anita; Manthovani, Kelly

doi:10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2486

Cited by 12 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Through e-c, the submission of trial documents such as Replicate, Duplicate, Conclusions and/or Answers can be exercised online and these documents will be accessible by the Court and the parties. Thus, the process of resolving cases at court is no longer always carried out in a conventional way, where the parties must come directly to the trial in the court [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effectiveness of Virtual Trials for Criminal Proceeding as an Effort to Mitigate the Spread of Corona Virus During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Jamila¹,

Rompegading²,

Hidayat³

2021

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2020 (ICLHR 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The first case of Covid-19 in Indonesia was found on 2 March 2020. Although enforcing health protocol is essential in this situation, the law enforcement to the community could not be set aside, especially for criminal proceeding highly related to human rights. Therefore, following the rise of the domestic cases, the Indonesia Supreme Court in cooperation with the Attorney General and the Ministry of Law and Human Rights has agreed to conclude an MOU deciding that during the Covid-19 Pandemic, the criminal proceeding will be conducted through virtual trial to mitigate the spread of the virus. It has been performed for approximately seven months and it is still ongoing. This is not a new practice in our court system as Supreme Court already has the e-court and e-Litigation programs long before the pandemic. Nevertheless, it focused on private proceedings instead of a criminal proceeding and it still has limited roles. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of virtual trials for criminal proceedings during the Covid-19 pandemic in General Courts by using a normative-empirical approach. The results of the research show that although the criminal proceedings have been conducted through virtual trials, it does not reduce the rights of the accused to seek justice. Furthermore, it has both advantages and disadvantages. Virtual trials help reduce the physical contact in court particularly in criminal proceedings. Thus, it helps mitigate the spread of virus among the judges, court staff, prosecutors, advocates, and the accused. However, the lack of facilities in relevant places such as courts, prosecutor offices, prisons, and detention houses becomes obstacle in carrying out the trial process. Virtual criminal proceedings also make it difficult for public prosecutors, judges, and advocates to gather facts through questions to the accused. Moreover, several aspects should be addressed and improved to provide better legal services to society.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effectiveness of Virtual Trials for Criminal Proceeding as an Effort to Mitigate the Spread of Corona Virus During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Jamila¹,

Rompegading²,

Hidayat³

2021

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2020 (ICLHR 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…66 all courts use e-court and rather use conventional procedures. 67 This is caused by the facts that there is no SOP or standard for e-court services, 68 not all human resources in the court understand e-court, 69 and internet access in Indonesia is not evenly distributed. 70 In addition, e-court can only be used if both parties give a consent to use it.…”

Section: Civil Justice Reform and The Efficiency Of Contract Law Enfo...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…67 This is caused by the facts that there is no SOP or standard for e-court services, 68 not all human resources in the court understand e-court, 69 and internet access in Indonesia is not evenly distributed. 70 In addition, e-court can only be used if both parties give a consent to use it. The absent of such a consent will make the litigation process done in conventional face-to-face mechanism.…”

Section: Civil Justice Reform and The Efficiency Of Contract Law Enfo...mentioning

confidence: 99%

HOW JUDICIARY SUPPORTS CONTRACT LAW ENFORCEMENT: Indonesian Experience

Herliana

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contract law enforcement matters since it is one of the indications used by the World Bank to determine ease of doing business. The more effective the settlement of agreement dispute, the better the business environment in a country. The issues with Indonesian Courts are inefficiency, inconsistency, and poor use of technology to support litigation process. This article aims to evaluate why the Indonesian judiciary reformation is yet to be swift and efficient in process. It is normative research using secondary data from regulation documents, books, articles, and journals. The data are analyzed qualitatively by organizing them into categories before coding. Then, they are analyzed using narrative analysis. The research results indicate that the Indonesian judiciary has not wholeheartedly implemented the reforms, indicated by the optional use of e-court and small claim court, lack of mediation skills and facilities, and lack of technology used for litigation process in courtroom. This research contributes in providing accurate information on how the judiciary should improve its performances to function efficiently so it supports government’s program to create positive business climate in Indonesia, by requiring simple lawsuit, e-court use expansion, optimal use of technology, and improving the judge’s skills.Penegakan hukum terhadap perjanjian hubungan bisnis memegang peranan penting karena menjadi salah satu indikator Bank Dunia dalam menentukan indeks kemudahan berusaha di suatu negara. Semakin efektif penyelesaian sengketa perjanjian, semakin baik pula iklim bisnis di suatu negara. Permasalahan yang dihadapi peradilan Indonesia adalah kurang efisien, tidak konsisten, dan juga kurang optimalnya penggunaan teknologi untuk mendukung proses litigasi. Penelitian ini menganalisis mengapa reformasi peradilan belum mengarah pada proses cepat dan efisien. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder dari peraturan, dokumen, buku, artikel, dan laporan penelitian. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan mengategorikan informasi sebelum dilakukan kodifikasi. Data yang telah dikodifikasi dianalisis secara naratif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa reformasi peradilan belum dilaksanakan sepenuhnya. Adapun indikasinya adalah penggunaan e-court dan gugatan sederhana yang masih opsional, kurangnya keterampilan mediasi yang dimiliki para hakim mediator, serta kurangnya penggunaan teknologi untuk mendukung proses litigasi. Penelitian ini bermanfaat memberikan informasi bagi dunia peradilan tentang bagaimana langkah yang harus diambil untuk menciptakan peradilan yang berfungsi efisien sehingga dapat mendukung upaya pemerintah menciptakan iklim berusaha yang positif di Indonesia dengan cara mewajibkan gugatan sederhana, perluasan penggunaan e-court, penggunaan teknologi dengan optimal dan peningkatan kapasitas hakim.

show abstract

“…The issuance of Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2018 concerning Case Administration in the Court Electronically which was later revised by the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2019 concerning Electronic Case Administration and Trials in Courts marks a new chapter of the trial process in Indonesia which carries a simple principle, fast and low cost. The e-court application is a series of processes for accepting claims or requests, answers, replications, duplicates, and conclusions, management, submission and storage of case documents using an electronic system applicable in each court environment [10]. The birth of the e-Court is an innovation as well as a commitment for the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in realizing reforms in the Indonesian judiciary (Justice reform) which synergizes the role of information technology (IT) with procedural law (IT for Judiciary) [11].…”

Section: Digitalization Of the Judicial Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bailiffs’ Training Needs Analysis for Supporting The Digitalization of Judicial Processes in Indonesia in The Pandemic Era

Syahr¹,

Albana²

2021

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2021, March 6th 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bailiffs are part of the judicial apparatus who have the task of executing decisions. The execution is vital to enforce the law for people who seek justice; however, during the Covid-19 pandemic, many executions must be delayed and switched by implementing virtual applications. Bailiffs faced many problems in adapting to a virtual task since there is no training to use these judicial applications. This paper's focussed issue is training needs analysis for bailiffs to do execution in the current pandemic era. The goal is to improve the competence of bailiffs as judicial apparatus. The method used was quantitative using a survey distributed to bailiffs in general, religion and state administrative court. The result was that bailiffs needed the training to improve their competence, especially using court applications and psychological and mass negotiation skills.

show abstract

Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik Dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Di Indonesia)

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

The Effectiveness of Virtual Trials for Criminal Proceeding as an Effort to Mitigate the Spread of Corona Virus During the Covid-19 Pandemic

The Effectiveness of Virtual Trials for Criminal Proceeding as an Effort to Mitigate the Spread of Corona Virus During the Covid-19 Pandemic

HOW JUDICIARY SUPPORTS CONTRACT LAW ENFORCEMENT: Indonesian Experience

Bailiffs’ Training Needs Analysis for Supporting The Digitalization of Judicial Processes in Indonesia in The Pandemic Era

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About