2008
DOI: 10.1002/ctpp.200810096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pellet – Plasma Interaction: an Analysis of Pellet Injection Experiments by Means of a Multi‐Dimensional MHD Pellet Code

Abstract: This work is aimed at the analysis of pellet injection experiments by means of a magnetohydrodynamic code that computes the processes of pellet ablation, expansion, ionization, and magnetic confinement of the ablated substance. In particular, experimental pellet injection scenarios stemming from the tokamak ASDEX-Upgrade (D2 pellets) and the stellarator W7-AS (carbon pellets) are analyzed by means of this time-dependent quasithree-dimensional MHD pellet code. Pellet penetration depths measured in ASDEX-Upgrade… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(199 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…that the spherically and longitudinally expanding parts of the cloud evolve independently, the consequence of which being that most of the shielding is due to the neutral cloud, the ionized sheath acting only as a correction [7]. Practically, the penetration depths calculated with these different models are within ∼20% and reproduce reasonably well the measurements in present day machines for a wide range of pellet and plasma parameters [6,8]. Finally, 2D-time dependent MHD models are presently being developed by several authors [9,10], which do not consider a priori a total decoupling between the spherically and longitudinally expanding parts of the cloud.…”
Section: Ablationsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…that the spherically and longitudinally expanding parts of the cloud evolve independently, the consequence of which being that most of the shielding is due to the neutral cloud, the ionized sheath acting only as a correction [7]. Practically, the penetration depths calculated with these different models are within ∼20% and reproduce reasonably well the measurements in present day machines for a wide range of pellet and plasma parameters [6,8]. Finally, 2D-time dependent MHD models are presently being developed by several authors [9,10], which do not consider a priori a total decoupling between the spherically and longitudinally expanding parts of the cloud.…”
Section: Ablationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Also, characterizing the smallest required perturbation is indispensable to extrapolate for future experiments. That is why specific investigations were carried out in AUG and JET on the spatio-temporal structure and dynamics of ELMs in type-I ELM H mode plasmas 8 . This was done from the analysis of the time delay between the timing when the pellet crosses the last closed flux surface and the timing of the ELM.…”
Section: Elm Pacemakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the 1 The article is published in the original. 0 0 P nT α ∝ oretical and experimental works on pellet ablation and penetration into the tokamak plasma, as well as other magnetic confinement devices, has been intensively explored [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. An excellent review of pellet injec tion studies can be found in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More sophisticated ablation models consider the extra shielding of this cold plasmoid, electrostatic shielding due to the sheath built up at the interface of the plasmoid and the plasma, magnetic shielding due to the diamagnetism of the plasmoid [21,27]. In addition, the more complete and sophisticated ablation models also take into account one or more of following physical factors or processes, i.e., Maxwellian energy distribution of background electrons, the presence of high energy particles in plasma, the influence of inhomogeneous heat flux from plasma and inhomogeneous heating of the plasmoid, atomic physics processes in the plasmoid, the possible deformation of the pellet due to ablation asymmetry, etc [27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%