Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa

Azzanira, Azzanira; Annalisa, Y; Syaifuddin, Muhammad

doi:10.32801/lamlaj.v3i1.59

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Perintah Ketua Pengadilan Agama tersebut diberikan dalam bentuk Penetapan Pengadilan, 74 yang dikeluarkan dalam jangka waktu paling lama 30 hari setelah permohonan eksekusi didaftarkan kepada Panitera Pengadilan Agama. 75 Apabila sengketa yang diajukan ke Basyarnas mengandung unsur-unsur asing, 76 Arbiter yang ada di lingkungan Basyarnas juga harus memiliki pengetahuan yang mendalam mengenai keberadaan unsur-unsur asing di dalam suatu hubungan hukum.…”

Section: Asingunclassified

Arbitrase Online di Masa Pandemi:

Heriyanto,

Diffaul Barraq Suwatono,

Syahputra Lubis

2023

Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this pandemic situation, the need for online arbitration services is very urgent, especially for the business community. As a country with a majority of the Muslim population, Indonesia has established Basyarnas as an alternative dispute resolution institution based on sharia law. In the era of globalization, business disputes that occur today are not on disputes between citizens or legal entities originating from Indonesia only, but also, include disputes that have a cross-border nature, either because of the differences in the domicile of the parties or because of the choice of foreign law clause. This research will study the role and readiness of Basyarnas in resolving cross-border disputes. Besides that, the implications of the arbitration award issued by Basyarnas will also be studied from disputes that contain foreign elements. These two problems will be studied using a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. Through this research, it can be concluded that: first, Basyarnas as a sharia arbitral award in Indonesia should have competence and ability to handle sharia disputes that are cross-border; and second, because of the existence of foreign elements in sharia relationship from both parties, it is necessary to recognize sharia arbitral award in the country where the assets are located.

show abstract

Section: Asingunclassified

Arbitrase Online di Masa Pandemi:

Heriyanto,

Diffaul Barraq Suwatono,

Syahputra Lubis

2023

Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Salah satu contoh kasus terbaru pada pembatalan putusan arbitrase adalah disaat English High Court membatalkan putusan arbitrase dengan dasar serious irregularity 68(2)(a) pada kasus RJ and another v HB [2018] EWHC 2833. Kasus ini termasuk kasus yang menarik sebagai contoh pembatalan putusan arbitrase di Inggris.…”

Section: Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase DI Jepangunclassified

Perbandingan Konsep Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Di Beberapa Negara

Nurhayati

2022

JIC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to dissect the concept of annulment of arbitral awards in several countries. Arbitration disputes are one of the options in resolving business disputes that are used in various countries in the world, one of which is Indonesia. Arbitration, both national and international, has a very important role in the business world which continues to develop, especially in the digital era. However, the arbitration award which has a final and binding nature still has a denial effort through the annulment of the award. In Indonesia, the provisions for the cancellation of arbitration are regulated in Article 70 of the Arbitration Law which has changed from the provisions before the birth of the Arbitration Law. This study uses a normative research method (comparative descriptive) which focuses on comparing the concept of annulment of arbitral awards in several countries in accordance with the laws and regulations in force in each country, not only discussing the rejection of the implementation of arbitral awards in comparison of two countries, the conditions for the cancellation of arbitral awards. national or international arbitral award. The results of the study showed that although arbitration applies in almost many countries, the provisions for the cancellation of arbitration awards in several countries are different. Penelitian ini bertujuan membedah konsep pembatalan putusan arbitrase dibeberapa negara. Sengketa arbitrase menjadi salah satu pilihan dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis yang digunakan diberbagai negara di dunia salah satunya di Indonesia. Arbitrase baik nasional maupun internasional memiliki peran yang sangat penting dalam dunia bisnis yang terus mengalami perkembangan terutama di era digital. Namun putusan arbitrase yang memiliki sifat final dan binding pun tetap memiliki upaya penyangkalan melalui pembatalan putusan. Di Indonesia ketentuan pembatalan arbitrase diatur dalam Pasal 70 UU Arbitrase yang mengalami perubahan dari ketentuan sebelum lahirnya UU arbitrase. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif (deskriptif perbandingan) yang berfokus pada perbandingan konsep pembatalan putusan arbitrase di beberapa negara sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undanagn yang berlaku di tiap negara, tidaka hanya membahas tentang penolakan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase perbandingan dua negara saja, syarat pembatalan putusan arbitrase nasional atau pembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional. Hasil penelitian didapatkan bahwa meskipun arbitrase berlaku di hampir banyak negara namun ketentuan pembatalan putusan arbitrase dibeberapa negara berbeda-beda.

show abstract

Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Arbitrase Online di Masa Pandemi:

Arbitrase Online di Masa Pandemi:

Perbandingan Konsep Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Di Beberapa Negara

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About