2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peptide-based delivery to bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the osteoporosis drug Forteo 1 (generic name: teriparatide) must be administered daily via injection and is associated with severe systemic side effects such as headaches, orthostatic hypertension, hypercalcaemia, and potentially tumors (Cipriani et al, 2012). It would be safer and more effective if the drug could be delivered specifically to bone tissue via a controllable, sustained release delivery system (Aoki et al, 2012). Therefore, there exists a strong need for developing a targeted delivery system specific to bone tissue by using a sustained release drug delivery device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the osteoporosis drug Forteo 1 (generic name: teriparatide) must be administered daily via injection and is associated with severe systemic side effects such as headaches, orthostatic hypertension, hypercalcaemia, and potentially tumors (Cipriani et al, 2012). It would be safer and more effective if the drug could be delivered specifically to bone tissue via a controllable, sustained release delivery system (Aoki et al, 2012). Therefore, there exists a strong need for developing a targeted delivery system specific to bone tissue by using a sustained release drug delivery device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While injectable systems are more commonly thought of in reference of depot systems, it is also important to consider the role of surgically placed depots as well; drug-loaded polymeric and ceramic scaffolds are an ideal approach to drug delivery to fracture sites and bone surfaces following surgical intervention. Drug loading into supportive structures for continuous release with or without drug carriers provides local chemical treatment as the graft is resorbed, allowing for ensured delivery of therapeutics to the desired site, as demonstrated by Orellana et al using simvastatin and a model protein [96]. Further, certain ceramic materials may act as depots for bioactive molecules without additional loading or modification; silicon, magnesium, and strontium based ceramics release metal ions that promotes osteogenic function and inhibit resorptive behavior [9799].…”
Section: Drug Delivery Approaches For Osteoporosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to have a further improvement on the biological activity and osteogenic ability of materials, researchers have studied the binding of biologically active molecules (including growth factors and peptides) to the surface of biomaterials . Among the biologically active molecules, osteogenesis‐related synthesis of peptide and associated matrixes have a low cost but a strong stability when compared to active proteins with longer amino acid sequences, as a result, peptides are potentially more suitable as bone repair materials . In addition, small peptides are superior to large peptides and proteins for their ability to bind with higher affinities to integrins and resistance to proteolysis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%