Perbandingan Analisis Model Z”-Score Altman Modifikasi, Model X-Score Zmijewski, Model G-Score Grover, Dan Model S-Score Springate Untuk Menganalisis Ketepatan Prediksi Kebangkrutan

Winarso, Eddy; Edison, Thomas

doi:10.28932/jafta.v1i2.2451

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Dengan penghapusan (X5) pada model modifikasi ini dapat dipakai dalam menakar kebangkrutan pada perusahaan manufaktur dan nonmanufaktur. [12] p-ISSN: 2597-3665 e-ISSN: 2685-2837…”

Section: Gambar 1 Grafik Pertumbuhan Car Dan Fdr/ldr Pada Bus Dan Buk...unclassified

Analisis Prediksi Kebangkrutan Bank Syariah Dan Bank Konvensional Dengan Metode Altman Z-Score Modifikasi

Mauluddi,

Fauziah

2022

maps

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The presence of COVID-19 in Indonesia impacts the performance of the CAR, FDR/LDR, and NPF/NPL ratios. If the bank does not improve its performance, the bank will threaten with financial distress, which is the initial stage of bankruptcy. This condition has happened to PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia and PT. Bank Maybank Indonesia. The bankruptcy prediction model used in this study is the Altman Z-Score Modification to compare bankruptcy scores and the effect of the CAR, FDR/LDR, and NPF/NPL ratios on the Z-Score value of BUS and BUK Non-BUMN with the results of CAR values. BUS Non-BUMN has a positive and significant effect, while the CAR value of BUK Non-BUMN has a positive and insignificant effect. The value of FDR/LDR has a positive and not significant effect. The NPF value has a negative and negligible effect, while the NPL value has a positive and significant impact.

show abstract

“…Dengan penghapusan (X5) pada model modifikasi ini dapat dipakai dalam menakar kebangkrutan pada perusahaan manufaktur dan nonmanufaktur. [12] p-ISSN: 2597-3665 e-ISSN: 2685-2837…”

Section: Gambar 1 Grafik Pertumbuhan Car Dan Fdr/ldr Pada Bus Dan Buk...unclassified

Analisis Prediksi Kebangkrutan Bank Syariah Dan Bank Konvensional Dengan Metode Altman Z-Score Modifikasi

Mauluddi,

Fauziah

2022

maps

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Uji Hipotesis yang dilakukan Winarso menggunakan 13 sampel perusahaan Manufaktur yang tercatat di BEI. Meskipun dalam jurnal yang diunggah tidak dicantumkan berapa tingkat akurasinya, tapi Winarso jelas mencantumkan Uji Hipotesis sebagai pengujian ketepatan prediksi financial distress menggunakan metode-metode yang ia gunakan [12].…”

Section: Uji Perbandingan Perhitungan Prediksi Dengan Keadaan Real Koperasiunclassified

Rancang Bangun Sistem Prediksi Financial Distress Menggunakan Metode Altman Z-Score Modifikasi Pada Koperasi XYZ

Primadani¹,

Ariasih²

2021

INFORMAL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Financial distress is a condition in which a company begins to show signs of bankruptcy due to a decline in the company's financial condition. XYZ Cooperative is a savings and loan cooperative that needs to be aware of experiencing financial distress. What's more, the XYZ cooperative has experienced fluctuating asset conditions, even for profit in a certain month, it has experienced a negative or loss condition. Another problem that occurred is the covid-19 pandemic which made it difficult for people to carry out their obligations such as paying credit. This made the XYZ Cooperative's income experience a drastic decline from the previous year. Meanwhile, currently XYZ Cooperative does not have a prediction system or has never predicted financial distress in its company Based on these problems, an idea emerged to design and build a financial distress prediction system at the XYZ Cooperative using the Modified Altman Z-Score method. This model was chosen because the financial ratios used in prediction calculations are in accordance with the financial ratios of the XYZ Cooperative. The final result of this research is the construction of a prediction system using the Altman Z-Score Modification method on the desktop-based XYZ Cooperative. From the 3 years of financial reports that were tested from 2017 to 2019, the prediction results were at a safe point, namely the Z value above 2.6. The calculation results for 2017 is 8.19, 2018 is 8.11 and 2019 is 7.82. However, the predicted Z value from 2017 to 2019 has decreased, although it is not significant. The accuracy calculation obtained compares the prediction results with the real situation of the cooperative using the average comparison formula and the typer error II formula. Where from the 3 sample data tested, the results of the sample received were 3 with a data error of 0.

show abstract

“…,Winarso & Edison (2020),Azzahro & Seomaryono (2020),Widiasmara & Rahayu (2019),Karas & Srbova (2019),Kartikasari & Hariyani (2019),Eksa (2019), Syami (2018),Nilasari & Haryanto (2018),Primasari (2018),Kusumaningtyas (2017),Chrisnawan & Norita (2017) danMeiliawati (2016). Kemudian, peneliti juga melakukan pembuktian lanjutan untuk memperkuat hasil pengujian hipotesis dengan menyajikan hasil kalkulasi setiap model prediksi kebangkrutan yang diteliti.…”

unclassified

Analisis Perbandingan Model Taffler, Springate, dan Grover Dalam Memprediksi Kebangkrutan Perusahaan

Prakoso¹,

Ulupui

Perdana

2022

JAPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji apakah terdapat perbedaan antara hasil prediksi kebangkrutan model Taffler, Springate, dan Grover dalam memprediksi kebangkrutan perusahaan ritel yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2017-2019. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan menggunakan purposive sampling. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder yang bersumber dari laporan keuangan perusahaan ritel selama tahun 2017-2019. Pengujian hipotesis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan uji kruskal wallis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara hasil prediksi kebangkrutan pada perusahaan ritel yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2017-2019 yang diukur dengan model Taffler, Springate, dan Grover. Hal ini disebabkan karena terdapat Perbedaan yang menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan rasio keuangan yang digunakan dan kriteria nilai kebangkrutan masing-masing model prediksi kebangkrutan. Kemudian Model Tafller merupakan model prediksi kebangkrutan yang paling akurat dengan tingkat akurasi 96% dan memiliki tingkat kesalahan terendah 4%.

show abstract

Perbandingan Analisis Model Z”-Score Altman Modifikasi, Model X-Score Zmijewski, Model G-Score Grover, Dan Model S-Score Springate Untuk Menganalisis Ketepatan Prediksi Kebangkrutan

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Analisis Prediksi Kebangkrutan Bank Syariah Dan Bank Konvensional Dengan Metode Altman Z-Score Modifikasi

Analisis Prediksi Kebangkrutan Bank Syariah Dan Bank Konvensional Dengan Metode Altman Z-Score Modifikasi

Rancang Bangun Sistem Prediksi Financial Distress Menggunakan Metode Altman Z-Score Modifikasi Pada Koperasi XYZ

Analisis Perbandingan Model Taffler, Springate, dan Grover Dalam Memprediksi Kebangkrutan Perusahaan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About