2022
DOI: 10.30865/mib.v6i3.4194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perbandingan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS untuk Pemilihan Karyawan Berprestasi

Abstract: This study designed a system to determine outstanding employee selection using a Decision Support System (DSS) with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The purpose of this study is to analyze the accuracy in making decisions. The stages of this research are collecting employee data and criteria data, then weighting the criteria and assessment, after that the calculation uses the AHP and TOPSIS methods, and the last st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are obtained as in the Table 9. Calculate the preference value of each alternative using formula (7).…”
Section: B Topsis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results are obtained as in the Table 9. Calculate the preference value of each alternative using formula (7).…”
Section: B Topsis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a computer-based system that can collect and process information data to be helpful so that it can assist in making decisions by utilizing data and models to solve structured and unstructured problems [7].…”
Section: A Decision Support System (Dss)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Permasalahan multikriteria yang sangat lengkap menjadi suatu hirarki diselesaikan dengan metode AHP [14]. Metode AHP sangat efektif untuk menyelesaikan masalah-maslah yang lengkap [15].…”
Section: A Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)unclassified
“…Menghasilkan system keputusan pendukung untuk memilih kulit ular yang layak dijadikan kerajinan kulit dengan metode AHP dilakukan oleh Sari dkk dengan kriteria pembobotan meliputi Python, Sunbeam, Radiata dan 207 disarankan adalah Bisi 18 (Fatayat et al, 2022). Penelitian terdahulu yang dilakukan oleh Sunardi dkk dalam implementasi perhitungan pegawai terbaik menggunakan metode AHP alternatif yang didapat 100% sama dengan perhitungan tidak menggunakan metode, sedangkan dengan menggunakan metode SAW memiliki perbedaan sebanyak 33,33% (Sunardi & Kriestanto, 2016). Dari kajian literatur tersebut AHP memiliki keunggulan dalam pembobotan dan peningkatan akurasi pada sistem pendukung keputusan.…”
Section: Tinjauan Pustakaunclassified